EHR-based Case Identification of Pediatric Long COVID: A Report from the RECOVER EHR Cohort
Botdorf, M.; Dickinson, K.; Lorman, V.; Razzaghi, H.; Marchesani, N.; Rao, S.; Rogerson, C.; Higginbotham, M. J.; Mejias, A.; Salyakina, D.; Thacker, D.; Dandachi, D.; Christakis, D.; Taylor, E.; Schwenk, H.; Morizono, H.; Cogen, J.; Pajor, N. M.; Jhaveri, R.; Forrest, C.; Bailey, C.; RECOVER Consortium,
Show abstract
ObjectiveLong COVID, marked by persistent, recurring, or new symptoms post-COVID-19 infection, impacts childrens well-being yet lacks a unified clinical definition. This study evaluates the performance of an empirically derived Long COVID case identification algorithm, or computable phenotype, with manual chart review in a pediatric sample. This approach aims to facilitate large-scale research efforts to understand this condition better. MethodsThe algorithm, composed of diagnostic codes empirically associated with Long COVID, was applied to a cohort of pediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the RECOVER PCORnet EHR database. The algorithm classified 31,781 patients with conclusive, probable, or possible Long COVID and 307,686 patients without evidence of Long COVID. A chart review was performed on a subset of patients (n=651) to determine the overlap between the two methods. Instances of discordance were reviewed to understand the reasons for differences. ResultsThe sample comprised 651 pediatric patients (339 females, Mage = 10.10 years) across 16 hospital systems. Results showed moderate overlap between phenotype and chart review Long COVID identification (accuracy = 0.62, PPV = 0.49, NPV = 0.75); however, there were also numerous cases of disagreement. No notable differences were found when the analyses were stratified by age at infection or era of infection. Further examination of the discordant cases revealed that the most common cause of disagreement was the clinician reviewers tendency to attribute Long COVID-like symptoms to prior medical conditions. The performance of the phenotype improved when prior medical conditions were considered (accuracy = 0.71, PPV = 0.65, NPV = 0.74). ConclusionsAlthough there was moderate overlap between the two methods, the discrepancies between the two sources are likely attributed to the lack of consensus on a Long COVID clinical definition. It is essential to consider the strengths and limitations of each method when developing Long COVID classification algorithms.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes of 55,270 children and adolescents diagnosed with COVID-19 and 1,952,693 with influenza in France, Germany, Spain, South Korea and the United States: an international network cohort study 94%
- Multidimensional and Longitudinal Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for Critically Ill Infants 91%
- Severe outcomes in unvaccinated COVID-19 cases <18 years during different variant waves in Norway 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of a pediatric telemedicine and medication delivery service in a resource-limited setting: A pilot study for clinical safety and feasibility 94%
- Croup during the COVID-19 Omicron Variant Surge 92%
- Rapid Genome Sequencing Compared to a Gene Panel in Infants with a Suspected Genetic Disorder: An Economic Evaluation 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical features and burden of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents: an exploratory EHR-based cohort study from the RECOVER program 96%
- Acute upper airway disease in children with the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a report from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) 93%
- Evaluation of a Large Language Model to Identify Confidential Content in Adolescent Encounter Notes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection in emergency department patients: The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Infection Score (CCIS) 94%
- Development and validation of multivariable prediction models for adverse COVID-19 outcomes in IBD patients 94%
- Viral And Antibody Testing For Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Factors Associated With Positivity In Electronic Health Records From The United States 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.