Back

Causal network perturbation analysis identifies known and novel type-2 diabetes driver genes

Zhao, Y.; Taha, H. B.; Aman, A.; Qian, K.; Kumar, P.; Mahoney, J. M.; He, H.; George, J.; Li, S.

2025-11-11 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.05.22.595431 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The molecular pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) involves environmental and genetic factors that remain poorly understood. Increased insulin resistance leads to pancreatic {beta}-islet cell exhaustion and failure, leading to more severe T2DM. As such, targeting {beta}-cell dysfunction is an attractive pathway for T2DM treatment. Single-cell RNA sequencing can help identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that may contribute to disease-associated pathophysiology, but cannot capture the full spectrum of disease pathophysiology, as some genes that are not differentially expressed may still play important roles in disease progression or mechanisms. As such, we investigated single-cell gene expression changes in {beta}-cells from healthy (C57BL/6J) and diabetic (NZO/HlLtJ) mice fed with normal or high-fat, high-sugar diet (HFHS) across the spectrum of T2DM development (prediabetic, mild or severely diabetic) using an innovative integration of the causal network perturbation assessment (ssNPA) framework with meta-cell transcriptome analysis to identify driver genes for T2DM. By generating a reference causal network and conducting in silico perturbations, we identified three classes of genes implicated in T2DM pathophysiology: (1) DEGs that were not perturbed (e.g, Igf2bp2 strongly linked to {beta} cell dysfunction and glucose regulation), (2) perturbed non-DEGs (e.g., Glp1r a therapeutic target of modern diabetes drugs) that were perturbed, and (3) DEGs that were perturbed (e.g., Pdx1 a master {beta} cell transcription factor), and validated some of the targets using the KOMP database. Together, these results show that each analytic layer captures complementary mechanisms underlying T2DM severity, and their synthesis provides a more complete view of the disease pathophysiology.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.