Back

Timing antigenic escape in multiple myeloma treated with T-cell redirecting immunotherapies

Papadimitriou, M.; Ahn, S.; Diamond, B.; Lee, H.; McIntyre, J.; Truger, M.; Durante, M.; Ziccheddu, B.; Landgren, O.; Rasche, L.; Bahlis, N.; Neri, P.; Maura, F.

2024-05-26 genomics
10.1101/2024.05.22.595383 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent data highlight genomic events driving antigen escape as a recurring cause of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) and bispecific T-cell engager (TCE) resistance in multiple myeloma (MM). Yet, it remains unclear if these events, leading to clonal dominance at progression, result from acquisition under treatment selection or selection of pre-existing undetectable clones. This differentiation gains importance as these immunotherapies progress to earlier lines of treatment, prompting the need for innovative diagnostic testing to detect these events early on. By reconstructing phylogenetic trees and exploring chemotherapy mutational signatures as temporal barcodes in 11 relapsed refractory MM patients with available whole genome sequencing data before and after CART/TCE treatment, we demonstrated that somatic antigen escape mechanisms for BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeting therapies are acquired post-diagnosis, likely during CART/TCE treatment. Longitudinal tracking of these mutations using digital PCR in 4 patients consistently showed that genomic events promoting antigen escape were not detectable during the initial months of therapy but began to emerge nearly 1 year post therapy initiation. This finding reduces the necessity for a diagnostic panel to identify these events before CART/TCE. Instead, it underscores the importance of surveillance and identifying patients at higher risk of acquiring these events. KEY POINTSO_LIGenomic events driving antigen escape are recurrent mechanisms of resistance to CART and T-cell engagers in multiple myeloma. C_LIO_LIUsing chemotherapy mutational signatures, we demonstrated that these events are most likely acquired during treatment. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.