Back

Leveraging Descriptor Learning and Functional Map-based Shape Matching for Automatic Landmark Acquisition

Thomas, O. O.; Maga, A. M.

2024-05-26 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.05.22.595350 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Geometric morphometrics is widely employed across the biological sciences for the quantification of morphological traits. However, the scalability of these methods to large datasets is hampered by the requisite placement of landmarks, which can be laborious and time consuming if done manually. Additionally, the selected landmarks embody a particular hypothesis regarding the critical geometry pertinent to the biological inquiry at hand. Modifying this hypothesis lacks flexibility, necessitating the acquisition of an entirely new set of landmarks on the entire dataset to reflect any theoretical adjustments. In our research, we investigate the precision and accuracy of landmarks derived from the comprehensive set of functional correspondences acquired through the functional map framework of geometry processing. We use a deep functional map network to learn shape descriptors that effectively yield functional map-based and point-to-point correspondences between the specimens in our dataset. We then interrogate these maps to identify corresponding landmarks given manually placed landmarks from the entire dataset. We assess our method by automating the landmarking process on a dataset comprising mandibles from various rodent species, comparing its efficacy against MALPACA, a cutting-edge technique for automatic landmark placement. Compared to MALPACA, our model is notably faster and maintains competitive accuracy. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) analysis reveals that while MALPACA generally exhibits the lowest RMSE, our models perform comparably, especially with smaller training datasets, suggesting strong generalizability. Visual evaluations confirm the precision of our landmark placements, with deviations remaining within an acceptable range. These findings underscore the potential of unsupervised learning models in anatomical landmark placement, providing a viable and efficient alternative to traditional methods.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
15.5%
2
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.3%
3
Evolutionary Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
9
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.2%
11
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
17
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
18
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.0%
22
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%