Back

Flexible males, proactive females: personality tests show increased boldness/exploration in colonists damping with time in males but not in females

Tchabovsky, A. V.; Surkova, E. N.; Savinetskaya, L. E.; Khropov, I. S.

2024-05-22 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2024.05.22.595322 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Individuals colonizing new areas at expanding ranges encounter challenging and unfamiliar environments, suggesting that colonists should differ in behavioural traits from the residents of the source populations. The colonizer syndrome is supposed to be associated with boldness, exploration, activity, and low sociability. We assessed spatial and temporal variation in the colonizer syndrome in the expanding population of midday gerbils (Meriones meridianus). Male first colonists tended to be faster and bolder than residents, although the difference was not significant. Female first colonists were bolder, faster and more explorative than residents. These findings support boldness/exploration syndrome as a typical colonizer trait, which appears to be restricted to females in midday gerbils. Males and females also differed in the behavioural dynamics post-colony establishment. In males, boldness/exploration/sociability peaked in newly founded colonies, then sharply decreased in subsequent generations following decreasing environmental uncertainty in aging colonies. In females, increased boldness/exploration did not lower with time post-colonization, i.e. female colonists retained bold/explorative phenotype in subsequent generations despite facing a less challenging environment. Thus, female colonists, unlike males, carry a specialized behavioural colonizer phenotype corresponding to a proactive behavioural coping strategy. We link sex differences in behavioural traits of colonists to the sex-specific life-history strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.