Back

XplainScar: Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Identify and Localize Left Ventricular Scar in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy from 12-lead Electrocardiogram

Nezamabadi, K.; Sivalokanathan, S.; Lee, J. W.; Tanriverdi, T.; Chen, M.; Lu, D.-Y.; Abraham, J.; Sardaripour, N.; Li, P.; Mousavi, P.; Abraham, M. R.

2024-05-23 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.05.22.24307764 medRxiv
Show abstract

Left ventricular (LV) scar is a risk factor for sudden cardiac death and heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). LV scar is frequent in HCM and evolves over time. Hence there is a need for LV scar detection and longitudinal monitoring. The current gold standard for LV scar detection is late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is limited by high cost and susceptibility to artifacts from implanted defibrillators. We introduce XplainScar, the first explainable machine learning method for LV scar detection and localization in HCM, using 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) data, which is not influenced by implanted devices. We use 500 patients from the JH-HCM Registry for model development, and 248 patients from the UCSF-HCM-Registry for validation. XplainScar combines unsupervised and self-supervised ECG representation learning, resulting in high precision (90%), sensitivity (95%), specificity (80%) and F1-score (90%) for scar detection in the basal, mid, and apical LV myocardium, with a processing time of <1 minute per 10 patients. Basal LV scar prediction by XplainScar is dominated by QRS features, and mid/apical LV scar by T wave features. XplainScar generalizes well to the held-out test UCSF data, with 88% precision, 90% sensitivity, 78% specificity, and F1-score of 89%. In summary, XplainScar demonstrates good performance for LV scar detection, and provides ECG signatures of basal, mid, and apical LV scar in HCM. XplainScar is publicly available at https://github.com/KasraNezamabadi/XplainScar

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.4%
2
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.6%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
6
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
9
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
10
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
13
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
17
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
18
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
20
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
23
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%