Back

Subclinical SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Endemic Human Coronavirus Immunity Shape SARS-CoV-2 Saliva Antibody Responses

Conner, T. L.; Goguet, E.; Haines-Hull, H.; Segard, A.; Darcey, E.; Kobi, P.; Balogun, B.; Olsen, C.; Esposito, D.; Jones, M.; Burgess, T.; O'Connell, R. J.; Broder, C. C.; Saunders, D.; Pollett, S.; Laing, E. D.; Mitre, E.

2024-05-22 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.05.22.24307751 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study characterized antibody responses induced by COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection in saliva. Utilizing multiplex microsphere-based immunoassays, we measured saliva anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG, IgA, and secretory IgA in 1,224 saliva samples collected from healthcare workers in the Prospective Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Seroconversion study between August of 2020 through December of 2022. By spring of 2022, most individuals had detectable spike-specific antibodies in saliva. Longitudinal measurements of saliva anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG revealed that most spike-specific IgA and secretory IgA detected in saliva was driven by subclinical and clinically-evident infections, rather than by vaccination alone. In contrast, saliva anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG was strongly induced by vaccination and exhibited improved durability with hybrid immunity. Baseline levels of saliva antibodies to the endemic human coronaviruses positively correlated with post-vaccination anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG levels. This study provides insights for development of vaccines that generate mucosal antibodies to respiratory pathogens. HIGHLIGHTSSaliva anti-spike antibodies were present in > 90% of participants by spring 2022 Saliva anti-spike IgA was driven by subclinical and clinically evident infections COVID-19 mRNA vaccination alone was a weak inducer of saliva IgA antibodies HCoV immunity correlates with post-vaccine anti-spike saliva antibody levels

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.