Back

Engineering the Mechanical Stability of a Therapeutic Affibody/PD-L1 Complex by Anchor Point Selection

Yang, B.; Gomes, D. E. B.; Liu, Z.; Santos, M. S.; Li, J.; Bernardi, R. C.; Nash, M.

2024-05-21 biophysics
10.1101/2024.05.21.595133 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein-protein complexes can vary in mechanical stability depending on the direction from which force is applied. Here we investigated the anisotropic mechanical stability of a molecular complex between a therapeutic non-immunoglobulin scaffold called Affibody and the extracellular domain of the immune checkpoint protein PD-L1. We used a combination of single-molecule AFM force spectroscopy (AFM-SMFS) with bioorthogonal clickable peptide handles, shear stress bead adhesion assays, molecular modeling, and steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations to understand the pulling point dependency of mechanostability of the Affibody:(PD-L1) complex. We observed diverse mechanical responses depending on the anchor point. For example, pulling from residue #22 on Affibody generated an intermediate unfolding event attributed to partial unfolding of PD-L1, while pulling from Affibodys N-terminus generated force-activated catch bond behavior. We found that pulling from residue #22 or #47 on Affibody generated the highest rupture forces, with the complex breaking at up to [~] 190 pN under loading rates of [~]104-105 pN/sec, representing a [~]4-fold increase in mechanostability as compared with low force N-terminal pulling. SMD simulations provided consistent tendencies in rupture forces, and through visualization of force propagation networks provided mechanistic insights. These results demonstrate how mechanostability of therapeutic protein-protein interfaces can be controlled by informed selection of anchor points within molecules, with implications for optimal bioconjugation strategies in drug delivery vehicles.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.4%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.4%
3
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.7%
4
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 9%
5.3%
6
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
9
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
13
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Nature Nanotechnology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.6%
16
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
17
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Langmuir
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
22
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
24
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
25
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Biomacromolecules
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Chemical Communications
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Cell Reports Physical Science
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.6%