Back

Targeting DBS to the centrolateral thalamic nucleus improves movement in a lesion-based model of acquired cerebellar dystonia in mice

Nguyen, M. X.; Brown, A. M.; Lin, T.; Sillitoe, R. V.; Gill, J.

2024-05-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.05.21.595095 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dystonia is the third most common movement disorder and an incapacitating co-morbidity in a variety of neurologic conditions. Dystonia can be caused by genetic, degenerative, idiopathic, and acquired etiologies, which are hypothesized to converge on a "dystonia network" consisting of the basal ganglia, thalamus, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex. In acquired dystonia, focal lesions to subcortical areas in the network - the basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebellum - lead to a dystonia that can be difficult to manage with canonical treatments, including deep brain stimulation (DBS). While studies in animal models have begun to parse the contribution of individual nodes in the dystonia network, how acquired injury to the cerebellar outflow tracts instigates dystonia; and how network modulation interacts with symptom latency remain as unexplored questions. Here, we present an electrolytic lesioning paradigm that bilaterally targets the cerebellar outflow tracts. We found that lesioning these tracts, at the junction of the superior cerebellar peduncles and the medial and intermediate cerebellar nuclei, resulted in acute, severe dystonia. We observed that dystonia is reduced with one hour of DBS of the centrolateral thalamic nucleus, a first order node in the network downstream of the cerebellar nuclei. In contrast, one hour of stimulation at a second order node in the short latency, disynaptic projection from the cerebellar nuclei, the striatum, did not modulate the dystonia in the short-term. Our study introduces a robust paradigm for inducing acute, severe dystonia, and demonstrates that targeted modulation based on network principles powerfully rescues motor behavior. These data inspire the identification of therapeutic targets for difficult to manage acquired dystonia.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 5%
14.9%
2
Experimental Neurology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
4
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.7%
5
The Cerebellum
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.3%
8
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
11
Neuroscience Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.4%
14
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
15
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
16
Movement Disorders
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
Neurotherapeutics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
20
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
24
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
28
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
29
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%