Back

Using physiologically-based models to predict in vivo skeletal muscle energetics

Konno, R. N.; Lichtwark, G. A.; Dick, T. J.

2024-05-23 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.05.21.595083 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how muscles use energy is essential for elucidating the role of skeletal muscle in animal locomotion. Yet, experimental measures of in vivo muscle energetics are challenging to obtain, so physiologically-based muscle models are often used to estimate energy use. These predictions of individual muscle energy expenditure are not often compared to indirect whole body measures of energetic cost. Here, we examined and illustrated the capability of physiologically-based muscle models to predict in vivo measures of energy use. To improve model predictions and ensure a physiological basis for model parameters, we refined our model to include data from isolated muscle experiments. Simulations were performed to capture three different experimental protocols, which involved varying contraction frequency, duty cycle, and muscle fascicle length. Our results demonstrated that these models are able capture the general features of whole body energetics across contractile conditions, but tended to under predict the magnitude of energetic cost. Our analysis revealed that when predicting in vivo energetic rates across contractile conditions, the model was most sensitive to the force-velocity parameters and the data informing the energetic rates when predicting in vivo energetic rates across contractile conditions. This work highlights it is the mechanics of skeletal muscle contraction that govern muscle energy use.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.3%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.7%
3
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
8
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
9
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
15
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
25
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%