Combining clinical and diagnostic surveillance to estimate the burden of measles disease: a modeling study
Leung, T.; Ferrari, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe clinical case definition for measles is highly sensitive and has low specificity. Diag-nostic confirmation can resolve this uncertainty for individual cases and is a crucial tool for confirmation of measles outbreaks. However, in under-resourced settings, it is prohibitive to confirm all suspected cases and routine measles surveillance comprises a combination of both clinically and diagnostically confirmed cases. MethodsWe developed a dynamic model of measles, rubella, and other sources of febrile rash to simulate time series of a suspected measles surveillance system. We simulated partial reporting of suspected cases and limited routine diagnostic testing using assays with sensitivity and specificity that correspond to current or proposed rapid diagnostic tests. We estimated the time series of reported measles cases as the product of suspected cases and the proportion of diagnostic positive cases. We then estimated the reporting rate and annual incidence for measles using the time-series SIR model. ResultsReconstructing the time series of reported measles cases using the fraction of diagnostic positive cases results in unbiased estimates of the reporting rate and the annual incidence at moderate vaccination levels for all reasonable levels of test sensitivity and specificity, even for low proportions tested. At high vaccination levels, diagnostic tests with low sensitivity (< 90%) lead to slight bias in annual incidence. Temporal variation in the prevalence of measles among suspected cases require that the proportion of cases attributable to measles be estimated frequently (i.e., monthly) to avoid bias in estimates. ConclusionCombining routine, systematic diagnostic confirmation of suspected measles cases with suspected cases surveillance can improve estimates of the reporting rate and annual incidence using diagnostic tests with sensitivity and specificity consistent with proposed rapid diagnostic tests.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of children in the spread of COVID-19: Using household data from Bnei Brak, Israel, to estimate the relative susceptibility and infectivity of children 96%
- Using real-time data to guide decision-making during an influenza pandemic: a modelling analysis 96%
- Estimation of introduction and transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2 in a prospective household study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation of the infection attack rate of mumps in an outbreak among college students using paired serology 96%
- Using next generation matrices to estimate the proportion of cases that are not detected in an outbreak 96%
- A simulation-based approach for estimating the time-dependent reproduction number from temporally aggregated disease incidence time series data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- High variability in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 within households and implications for control 95%
- Which COVID policies are most effective? A Bayesian analysis of COVID-19 by jurisdiction 95%
- Routine immunization intensification, vaccination campaigns, and measles transmission in Southern Nigeria 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Refining reproduction number estimates to account for unobserved generations of infection in emerging epidemics 94%
- Improving the cost efficiency of preventive chemotherapy: impact of new diagnostics on stopping decisions for control of schistosomiasis 94%
- The impact of vaccination on COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.