Genetic Variants and Therapeutic Approaches in Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young: A Retrospective Analysis
Deng, L.; Shah, A. S.; Krishnamurthy, M.
Show abstract
ContextIdentifying Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) in patients with diabetes is essential because treatment differs significantly from other forms of diabetes. We identified patients with MODY gene variants and evaluated their clinical characteristics and responses to treatment. Evidence AcquisitionWe identified 106 patients with genetic MODY variants. Demographics, islet autoantibodies at diabetes diagnosis, co-morbidities, and response to treatment by genetic variant were evaluated. Evidence SynthesisPatients diagnosed with MODY variants comprised 4% of the total population with diabetes. Mean age and HbA1c of patients with MODY at diagnosis were 10.5 years and 8.2%, respectively. Surprisingly, diabetic ketoacidosis was a presenting feature for some (n=7, 6.8%), and others with MODY had positive islet cell autoantibodies (n= 7, 6.6%). Variants in HNF1A, GCK, and HNF1B were frequently observed (20%, 22%, and 17% respectively), while rare variants in PDX1, RFX6, BLK, and CNOT1 were uncovered. Initial and follow up treatment of patients with MODY were compared. For each medication (Insulin, Metformin, Sulfonylureas, and GLP-1 receptor agonists), a reduction in HbA1c was observed at follow-up (0.3-21%). Insulin and sulfonylureas were associated with an increase in average BMI (insulin: +8.23%, n=21, sulfonylurea: +0.63%, n=12) at follow-up, metformin was intermediate (-2.46%, n=4), and GLP-1 receptor agonists demonstrated the greatest decrease in BMI (-4.79%, n=4). ConclusionsThe presence of islet autoantibodies or diabetic ketoacidosis does not preclude the diagnosis of MODY. Given the observed improvements in BMI and HbA1c, further investigation into the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists as treatment for MODY should be considered.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Subgroups of young type 2 diabetes in India reveal insulin deficiency as a major driver 95%
- Non-autoimmune, lean diabetes in young people from Assam, India highlights the role of undernutrition in its aetiology - PHEnotypingNOrthEastINDianYoung type 2 diabetes (PHENOEINDY-2) 94%
- Young onset diabetes in Asian Indians is associated with lower measured and genetically determined beta-cell function: an INSPIRED study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Incretin hypersecretion in gestational diabetes mellitus 92%
- Prevalence trends of diabetes subgroups in US: A data-driven analysis spanning three decades from NHANES (1988-2018) 92%
- Circulating metabolic biomarkers are consistently associated with incident type 2 diabetes in Asian and European populations – a metabolomics analysis in five prospective cohorts 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment outcomes with oral anti-hyperglycaemic therapies in people with diabetes secondary to a pancreatic condition (type 3c diabetes): A population-based cohort study 92%
- Covid-19 fatality prediction in people with diabetes and prediabetes using a simple score at hospital admission 92%
- Hepatic and abdominal adiposity in type 2 diabetes as assessed with machine learning on CT scans 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic differences in the manifestation of early-onset type 2 diabetes 94%
- Comprehensive validation of fasting- and oral glucose tolerance test-based indices of insulin secretion against gold-standard measures 93%
- Time In Range, as measured by continuous glucose monitor, as a predictor of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes– A systemic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impacts of COVID-19 on glycemia and risk of diabetic ketoacidosis 94%
- MODY is prevalent in later-onset diabetes, has potential for targeted therapy but is challenging to identify 93%
- Improved specificity of glutamate decarboxylase 65 autoantibody measurement using luciferase-based immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assays 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.