Temporal trends and practice variation of paediatric diagnostic tests in primary care
Thomas, E. T.; Withrow, D. R.; Gill, P. J.; Perera-Salazar, R.; Heneghan, C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe primary objective was to investigate temporal trends and between-practice variability of paediatric test use in primary care. Methods and analysisThis was a descriptive study of population-based data from primary care consultation records from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2019. Children aged 0 to 15 who were registered to one of the 1,464 practices and had a diagnostic test code in their clinical record were included. The primary outcome measures were: 1) temporal changes in test rates measured by the average annual percent change (AAPC), stratified by test type, gender, age group, and deprivation level and 2) practice variability in test use, measured by the coefficient of variation (CoV). Results14,299,598 diagnostic tests were requested over 27.8 million child-years of observation for 2,542,101 children. Overall test use increased by 3.6%/year (95% CI 3.4 to 3.8%) from 399/1,000-child-years to 608/1,000 child-years, driven by increases in blood tests (8.0%/year, 95% CI 7.7 to 8.4), females aged 11-15 (4.0%/year, 95% CI 3.7 to 4.3), and the most socioeconomically deprived group (4.4%/year, 95% CI 4.1 to 4.8). Tests subject to the greatest temporal increases were fecal calprotectin, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and vitamin D. Tests classified as high use and high practice variability were iron studies, vitamin D, vitamin B12, folate, and coeliac testing. ConclusionsIn this first nationwide study of paediatric test use in primary care, we observed significant temporal increases and practice variability in testing. This reflects inconsistency in practice and diagnosis rates, and a scarcity of evidence-based guidance. Increased test use generates more clinical activity with significant resource implications, but conversely may improve clinical outcomes. Future research should evaluate whether increased test use and variability is warranted by exploring test indications and test results, and directly examine how increased test use impacts on quality of care. Key MessagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSPrevious research has shown that test use in adults within UK primary care sharply increased since 2000 and that there is a high degree of practice variation in test use. To date, no population-based studies have analysed paediatric test use in this setting. What this study addsIn England between 2007 and 2019, diagnostic test use increased by 4% per year, from 399 tests/1,000 child-years to 608 tests/1000-child years. Test increases were driven blood tests, especially in females aged 11-15 years of age, and children in the most deprived socioeconomic group. Specific tests that increased by the greatest margin include faecal calprotectin, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and vitamin D testing. Tests subject to the greatest practice variation by 2019 were FeNO, hearing tests, and vitamin D levels. How this study might affect research, practice or policyVariability in test use highlights a lack of standardised guidance and evidence in pediatric diagnostics, which has significant implications for downstream diagnostic activity, treatment, referrals and healthcare costs.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Primary care use of laboratory tests in Northern Ireland Western Health and Social Care Trust: a cross-sectional study 93%
- Prior health-related behaviours in children (2014-2020) and association with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test during adolescence (2020-2021): a retrospective cohort study using survey data linked with routine health data in Wales, UK 93%
- Prevalence and Incidence of Antibodies Against Sars-Cov-2 Among Primary Healthcare Providers in Belgium During One Year of the Covid-19 Epidemic: Prospective Cohort Study Protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 93%
- Preconception indicators and associations with health outcomes reported in UK routine primary care data: a systematic review 91%
- Suspected COVID-19 in primary care: how GP records contribute to understanding differences in prevalence by ethnicity. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Snotwatch COVID-Toes: An ecological study of chilblains and COVID-19 diagnoses in Victoria, Australia 94%
- Improving the quality of in-patient neonatal routine data as a pre-requisite for monitoring and improving quality of care at scale: A multi-site retrospective cohort study in Kenyan hospitals 93%
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying clinical skill gaps of healthcare workers using a digital clinical decision support algorithm during outpatient pediatric consultations in primary health centers in Rwanda 93%
- Factors associated with low school readiness, a linked health and education data study in Wales, UK 93%
- COVID-19 mitigation measures in primary schools and association with infection and school staff wellbeing: an observational survey linked with routine data in Wales, UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Home monitoring of HbA1c in diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and narrative synthesis on reliability, accuracy, and patient acceptability 91%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 90%
- Expectations and attitudes in primary care towards home-based testing for diagnosing asthma: a mixed methods study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.