Back
Top 28%
22.9%
#1
16.4%
Top 8%
15.1%
Top 18%
8.0%
Top 4%
6.1%
Top 3%
6.1%
Top 7%
3.7%
Top 19%
1.6%
Top 16%
1.6%
Top 6%
1.4%
Top 29%
0.7%
Top 6%
0.7%
Top 9%
0.7%
Top 14%
0.7%
Top 6%
0.7%
Health Disparities and Reporting Gaps in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Enabled Medical Devices: A Scoping Review of 692 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510k Approvals
2024-05-20
health policy
Title + abstract only
View on medRxiv
Show abstract
Machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI/ML) models in healthcare may exacerbate health biases. Regulatory oversight is critical in evaluating the safety and effectiveness of AI/ML devices in clinical settings. We conducted a scoping review on the 692 FDA 510k-approved AI/ML-enabled medical devices to examine transparency, safety reporting, and sociodemographic representation. Only 3.6% of approvals reported race/ethnicity, 99.1% provided no socioeconomic data. 81.6% did not report the a...
Predicted journal destinations
1
PLOS ONE
1737 training papers
2
JAMA Network Open
125 training papers
3
Scientific Reports
701 training papers
4
BMJ Open
553 training papers
5
npj Digital Medicine
85 training papers
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
81 training papers
7
PLOS Digital Health
88 training papers
8
Frontiers in Public Health
135 training papers
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
116 training papers
10
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
53 training papers
11
BMC Public Health
148 training papers
12
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 training papers
13
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 training papers
14
Vaccines
131 training papers
15
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
37 training papers