Analyzing Performance of Twist Bioscience Exome Enrichment with Spike-in CNV Backbone Panels at Various Probe Densities Leveraging Golden Helix VS-CNV Analysis Software
Fortier, N.; Rudy, G.; Han, T.; Davassi, A.; Scherer, A.
Show abstract
Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) offers a high diagnostic yield test by detecting pathogenic variants in all coding genes of the human genome. WES is poised to consolidate multiple genetic tests by accurately identifying Copy Number Variation (CNV) events, typically necessitating microarray analysis. However, standard commercial exome kits are typically limited to targeting exon coding regions, leaving significant gaps in coverage between genes, which could hinder comprehensive CNV detection. To convert microarray CNV calling with NGS, advances in both assay design and computational methods are needed. Addressing the need for comprehensive coverage, Twist Bioscience has developed an enhanced Exome 2.0 Plus Comprehensive Exome Spike-in panel with added CNV "backbone" probes. These probes target common SNPs polymorphic in multiple populations and are evenly distributed in the intergenic and intronic regions, with three varying densities at 25 kb, 50 kb, and 100 kb intervals from highest to lowest resolution respectively. Concurrently, Golden Helix has developed a multi-modal CNV caller designed specifically for target-capture NGS data to detect single-exon to whole-chromosome aneuploidy CNV events. This study evaluates the combined efficacy of the backbone-probe enhanced exome capture kit and VS-CNV 2.6 in identifying known CNVs using the Coriell CNVPANEL01 reference set. The integration of the enhanced capture kit with VS-CNV 2.6 achieved a 100% sensitivity rate for the detection of known CNV events at all three probe densities. The application of best-practice quality metrics, annotations, and filters was shown to have a minimal impact on this high sensitivity. These findings underscore the potential of the augmented Twist Exome in tandem with the VS-CNV caller and VarSeqs annotation and filtering capabilities. This combination presents a promising alternative to conventional microarray assays, potentially consolidating WES and CNV into a single assay obviating the need for additional testing in clinical CNV detection. The studys results advocate for the implementation of this integrated approach as a more efficient and equally sensitive method for CNV analysis in a clinical setting.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing sensitivity and coverage of clinical WGS as a diagnostic test for genetic disorders 94%
- Accuracy and Reproducibility of Somatic Point Mutation Calling in Clinical-Type Targeted Sequencing Data 92%
- GeneTerpret: a customizable multilayer approach to genomic variant prioritization and interpretation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rare Copy Number Variant analysis in case-control studies using SNP Array Data: a scalable and automated data analysis pipeline 96%
- CNVizard: a lightweight streamlit application for an interactive analysis of copy number variants 96%
- Detection and characterization of copy number variants based on whole-genome sequencing by DNBSEQ platforms 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-invasive prenatal testing by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions 94%
- Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing 92%
- Computational framework for targeted high-coverage sequencing based NIPT 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optical genome mapping as a next-generation cytogenomic tool for detection of structural and copy number variations for prenatal genomic analyses 95%
- VarGenius-HZD allows accurate detection of rare homozygous or hemizygous deletions in targeted sequencing leveraging breadth of coverage 93%
- Array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation and Droplet Digital PCR uncover recurrent copy number variation of the titin segmental duplication region 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.