Back

A multi-year longitudinal harmonization of quality controls in mass spectrometry proteomics core facilities

Chiva, C.; Olivella, R.; Staes, A.; Maia, T. M.; Panse, C.; Stejskal, K.; Douche, T.; Lombard, B.; Schuhmann, A.; Loew, D.; Mechtler, K.; Matondo, M.; Rettel, M.; Helm, D.; Impens, F.; Devos, S.; Shevchenko, A.; Nanni, P.; Sabido, E.

2024-05-19 biochemistry
10.1101/2024.05.19.594517 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quality control procedures play a pivotal role in ensuring the reliability and consistency of data generated in mass spectrometry-based proteomics laboratories. However, the lack of standardized quality control practices across laboratories poses challenges for data comparability and reproducibility. In response, we conducted a harmonization study within proteomics laboratories of the Core for Life alliance with the aim to establish a common quality control framework, which facilitates comprehensive quality assessment and identification of potential sources of performance drift. Through collaborative efforts, we developed a consensus quality control standard for longitudinal assessment and we adopted a common processing software. We generated a 4-year longitudinal dataset from multiple instruments and laboratories, which enabled us to assess intra- and inter-laboratory variability, to identify causes of performance drift, and to establish community reference values for several quality control parameters. Our study enhances data comparability and reliability and fosters a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement within the proteomics community to ensure the integrity of proteomics data.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.