Back

Advancing Privacy-Aware Machine Learning on Sensitive Data via Edge-Based Continual μ-Training for Personalized Large Models

Huang, Z.; Yu, L.; Herbozo Contreras, L. F.; Eshraghian, K.; Truong, N. D.; Nikpour, A.; Kavehei, O.

2024-05-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.05.18.24307564 medRxiv
Show abstract

This paper introduces an innovative method for fine-tuning a larger multi-label model for abnormality detection, utilizing a smaller trainer and advanced knowledge distillation techniques. It delves into the effects of fine-tuning on various abnormalities, noting varied improvements based on the Original Models performance in specific tasks. The experimental setup, optimized for on-device inference and fine-tuning with limited computational resources, demonstrates moderate yet promising enhancements in model performance post-fine-tuning. Key insights from the study include the importance of aligning the {micro}-Trainers behavior with the Original Model and the influence of hyper-parameters like the batch size on fine-tuning outcomes. The research acknowledges limitations such as the limited exploration of loss functions in multi-label models and constraints in architectural design, suggesting potential avenues for future investigation. While the proposed Naive Continual Fine-tuning Process is in its early stages, it highlights the potential for long-term model personalization. Moreover, using weight transfer exclusively for fine-tuning amplifies user privacy protection through on-device fine-tuning, devoid of transferring data or gradients to the server. Despite modest performance improvements after fine-tuning, these layers represent a small fraction (0.7%) of the total weights in the Original Model and 1.6% in the {micro}-Trainer. This study establishes a foundational framework for advancing personalized model adaptation, on-device inference, and fine-tuning while emphasizing the importance of safeguarding data privacy in model development.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.