Asymmetric stem cell division maintains the genetic heterogeneity of tissue cells
Bener, M. B.; Slepchenko, B. M.; Inaba, M.
Show abstract
Within a given tissue, the stem cell niche provides the microenvironment for stem cells suitable for their self-renewal. Conceptually, the niche space constrains the size of a stem-cell pool, as the cells sharing the niche compete for its space. It has been suggested that either neutral-or non-neutral-competition of stem cells changes the clone dynamics of stem cells. Theoretically, if the rate of asymmetric division is high, the stem cell competition is limited, thus suppressing clonal expansion. However, the effects of asymmetric division on clone dynamics have never been experimentally tested. Here, using the Drosophila germline stem cell (GSC) system, as a simple model of the in-vivo niche, we examine the effect of division modes (asymmetric or symmetric) on clonal dynamics by combining experimental approaches with mathematical modeling. Our results suggest that the rate of asymmetric division positively correlates with the time a stem cell clone takes to expand. Taken together, our data suggests that asymmetric division is essential for maintaining the genetic variation of stem cells and thus serves as a critical mechanism for safeguarding fertility over the animal age or preventing multiple disorders caused by the clonal expansion of stem cells.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergent multilevel selection in a simple spatial model of the evolution of altruism 95%
- Data-driven modeling predicts gene regulatory network dynamics during the differentiation of multipotential progenitors 94%
- Intra-tumor heterogeneity, turnover rate and karyotype space shape susceptibility to missegregation-induced extinction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.