Back

RNA viruses that exploit self-cleaving ribozymes for translation initiation

Lopez-Galiano, M. J.; Rueda, O.; Chiba, S.; Forgia, M.; Navarro, B.; Cervera, A.; Babaian, A.; Di Serio, F.; Turina, M.; De la Pena, M.

2026-02-18 microbiology
10.1101/2024.05.16.594327 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Small self-cleaving ribozymes are catalytic RNAs originally discovered in viroid-like agents, which are replicating circular RNAs (circRNAs) postulated as relics of a prebiotic RNA world. In the last decade, however, small ribozymes have also been detected across the tree of life, from bacterial to human genomes, and more recently, in unusual circRNA viruses. Here we report the conserved occurrence of diverse small ribozymes within the linear genomes of typical double- and single-stranded RNA virus families from fungi and plants. Type I hammerhead ribozyme motifs occur in the 5-UTR regions of chrysovirids and fusarivirids, displaying self-cleaving activity in vitro and in vivo. Similar hammerhead, as well as hepatitis delta and twister ribozymes, are also found in diverse megabirna-, hypo-, fusagra-, toti-or tombus-like viruses among others. The ribozymes occur not only as isolated motifs within UTRs but also as tandem pairs that encompass small RNA segments (186-399 nt) resembling Zetavirus-like sequences. In vivo characterization of the 5-UTR with a ribozyme from a chrysovirid revealed that the RNA-cleaving activity is essential for protein translation initiation in fungi. Analogous experiments in plants with diverse ribozyme motifs indicated that just the presence of a self-cleaving activity can induce cap-independent translation. We conclude that RNA self-cleaving activity, historically linked to the rolling circle replication of viroid-like circRNAs, appears to be co-opted by linear RNA viruses for translational roles.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.