Identifying barriers to genetic testing in subspecialty cardiac care
Pond, S.; Echols, G.; Tristani, M.; Etheridge, S.; Anderson, H. S.; Sawyer, B. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe utility of genetic testing in cardiovascular medicine is well-established in expert consensus statements for optimizing patient care. However, significant genetic testing care gaps persist for patients with inherited cardiovascular conditions. ObjectiveThis study aimed to understand why genetic testing care gaps in cardiovascular medicine exist by evaluating cardiovascular providers opinions and use of genetic testing. MethodsWe developed and administered an anonymous survey to cardiovascular providers delivering direct patient care in the United States. Participants were contacted in collaboration with the Sudden Arrhythmia Death Syndromes (SADS) Foundation. ResultsA total of 111 individuals completed the survey representing the following specialties: electrophysiology (55%, n=61), general cardiology (10.8%, n=12), imaging (7.2%, n=8), heart failure/transplant (6.3%, n=7), interventional cardiology (6.3%, n=7), fetal cardiology (5.4%, n=6), and other (9%, n=10). Eighty-six percent of respondents (n=97) stated genetic testing is very relevant in the care of their patients. Eighty percent of electrophysiologists reported ordering genetic testing a few times a month or more. Navigating insurance authorization and billing procedures was an identified area of discomfort by 47.7% of respondents (n=53). Overall, cardiovascular provider specialty was shown to impact how often genetic testing is ordered. Provider work setting was shown to impact opinion of the utility of genetic testing for family screening, opinion of the utility of genetic testing for medication and device management, and how often genetic testing is ordered. ConclusionsThe results of this study support targeted provider education to increase the uptake of genetic testing for patients with inherited cardiovascular conditions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 94%
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 93%
- ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient Screening for Self-Expanding Percutaneous Pulmonary Valves using Virtual Reality 94%
- Patient Risk-Benefit Preferences for Transcatheter versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair 93%
- Trends in Gaps of Care for Congenital Heart Disease Patients: Implications for Social Determinants of Health and Child Opportunity Index 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Referral for Cardiac Amyloidosis in Patients who underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Result of Quality Outcome Project 94%
- Hospitalist perspectives of available tests to monitor volume status in patients with heart failure: a qualitative study 93%
- Comparison of in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes among patients greater than and less than 80 years undergoing TAVR 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Global approaches to postmortem genetic testing after sudden cardiac death in the young: A survey among healthcare professionals 95%
- Procedural Volume and Outcomes with Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Report from the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry 91%
- Early Experience with Ivabradine for Focal Atrial Tachycardia in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.