Sensorimotor faculties bias perceptual decision-making
Kubanek, J.; Abrams, R.; Snyder, L.
Show abstract
Decision-making is a deliberate process that seemingly evolves under our own volition. Yet, research on embodied cognition has demonstrated that higher-order cognitive processes may be influenced, in unexpected ways, by properties of motor and sensory systems. Here we tested whether and how simple decisions are influenced by handedness and by asymmetries in the auditory system. Right- and left-handed participants performed an auditory decision task. In the task, subjects decided whether they heard more click sounds in the right ear or in the left ear, and pressed a key with either their right or left index finger, according to an instructed stimulus-key assignment (congruent or reversed). On some trials, there was no stimulus and subjects could choose either of the responses freely. When subjects chose freely, their choices were substantially governed by their handedness: Left-handed subjects were significantly biased to make the leftward choice, whereas right-handed subjects showed a substantial rightward bias. When the choice was governed by the sensory stimulus, subjects showed a rightward choice bias under the congruent key assignment, but this effect reversed to a leftward choice bias under the reversed key assignment. This result indicates a bias towards deciding that there were more clicks presented to the right ear. Together, our findings demonstrate that human choices can be considerably influenced by properties of motor and sensory systems.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissociable Pupil and Oculomotor Markers of Attention Allocation and Distractor Suppression during listening 94%
- Salience-dependent disruption of sustained auditory attention can be inferred from evoked pupil responses and neural tracking of task-irrelevant sounds 94%
- Cross-modal interactions between auditory attention and oculomotor control 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Both stimulus-specific and configurational features of multiple visual stimuli shape the spatial ventriloquism effect 94%
- No behavioral evidence for rhythmic facilitation of perceptual discrimination 94%
- Different time scales of common-cause evidence shape multisensory integration, recalibration and motor adaptation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.