The Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire as a screening tool for sleep-related breathing disorders: An Umbrella Review
Okuji, D.; Newcity, A.; Yavari, A.; Shahraki, F.; Erhenede, O.; Ahmed, Q.; Patenaude, R.; Twi-Yeboah, A.; McGowan, R.
Show abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this umbrella review was to assess available systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting on the use of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire as a screening tool for identifying sleep related breathing disorders in children, with subsequent referral from dentists to physicians. MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted with electronic databases to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting on the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire as a screening tool for pediatric sleep related breathing disorders. Eligible reviews were systematically selected and were assessed qualitatively with the AMSTAR 2 tool and quantitatively with meta-analyses methods. ResultsA total of 129 articles for possible inclusion were identified, and five studies were selected for quantitative analysis. Of these five studies, the overall AMSTAR 2 quality assessment showed two with moderate and three with low quality ratings. The five studies showed point-estimate mean values for prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, positive predictive value, negative predictive value as, respectively, respectively, 50.58, 74.97, 49.68, 58.16, 62.24 percent, and the diagnostic odds ratio as 6.94 percent for the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire tool. ConclusionsDentists should adhere to the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry guidelines and know that there is low to moderate evidence to support the utilization of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire as a sufficiently accurate screening tool for the diagnosis of sleep related breathing disorders in children, followed by an appropriate referral to a physician for comprehensive assessment and management.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 95%
- Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocol 94%
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 92%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 91%
- A proposed de-identification framework for a cohort of children presenting at a health facility in Uganda 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality assessment of studies included in Cochrane oral health systematic reviews 95%
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for COVID-19 in Intensive Care and Emergency Settings: A Systematic Review 93%
- Non-pharmacological therapies for post-viral syndromes, including Long COVID: A systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 91%
- Characterizing Potential Conflicts of Interest Among UpToDate and DynaMed Content Contributors 90%
- COVID-19 outcomes, risk factors and associations by race: a comprehensive analysis using electronic health records data in Michigan Medicine 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for network meta-analysis: a scoping review 95%
- Characteristics and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of prevalence studies in adult populations: a meta-epidemiological study 95%
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.