Predicting local control of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery with clinical, radiomics and deep learning features
Kanakarajan, H.; De Baene, W.; Sitskoorn, M.; Hanssens, P.
Show abstract
Background and purposeTimely identification of local failure after stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases allows for treatment modifications, potentially improving outcomes. Previous studies showed that adding radiomics or Deep Learning (DL) features to clinical features increased Local Control (LC) prediction accuracy. However, no study has integrated radiomics, DL, and clinical features into machine learning algorithms to predict LC. We examined whether a model using all these features achieves better accuracy than models using only a subset. Materials and methodsWe collected pre-treatment brain MRIs and clinical data for 129 patients at the Gamma Knife Center of the Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital. Radiomics features (extracted using the Python radiomics feature extractor) and DL features (extracted using a 3D ResNet model) were combined with clinical features. Performance of a Random Forest classifier was compared across four models trained with: clinical features only; clinical and radiomics features; clinical and DL features; and clinical, radiomics, and DL features. ResultsThe prediction model utilizing only clinical variables provided an Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.82 and an accuracy of 75.6%. Adding radiomics features increased the AUC to 0.88 and accuracy to 83.3%, while adding DL features resulted in an AUC of 0.86 and accuracy of 78.3%. The best performance came from combining clinical, radiomics, and DL features, achieving an AUC of 0.89 and accuracy of 87%. ConclusionIntegrating radiomics and DL features with clinical characteristics improves LC prediction after stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases. These findings demonstrate the potential for early outcome prediction, enabling timely treatment modifications to improve patient management. Clinical and Translational Impact StatementOur study holds great clinical value, as the increased prediction accuracy can lead to tailored and effective interventions, resulting in better outcomes for brain metastases patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Radiomic-Based Approaches in the Multi-metastatic Setting: A Quantitative Review 97%
- Updated Results of 3,050 Non-melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) Lesions in 1725 Patients Treated with High Resolution Dermal Ultrasound-Guided Superficial Radiotherapy, A Multi-institutional Study 93%
- Detection of local microvascular proliferation in IDH wild-type Glioblastoma using relative Cerebral Blood Volume 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Radiomic Feature Aggregation Methods for Patients with Multiple Tumors 96%
- Identifying relationships between imaging phenotypes and lung cancer-related mutation status: EGFR and KRAS 95%
- Association of Graph-based Spatial Features with Overall Survival Status of Glioblastoma Patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality Assurance Assessment of Intra-Acquisition Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registration and Contour Propagation for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 95%
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 95%
- Persistent Homology of Tumor CT Scans is Associated with Survival In Lung Cancer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Imaging-Genomics Study Of Head-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Associations Between Radiomic Phenotypes And Genomic Mechanisms Via Integration Of TCGA And TCIA 94%
- Large language models to help appeal denied radiotherapy services 93%
- Descriptive and prognostic value of a computational model of metastasis in high-risk neuroblastoma 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.