Back

Mutation frequency and copy number alterations determine prognosis and metastatic tropism in 60,000 clinical cancer samples

Calonaci, N.; Krasniqi, E.; Scalera, S.; Gandolfi, G.; Milite, S.; Ricciuti, B.; Maugeri-Sacca, M.; Caravagna, G.

2024-05-13 oncology
10.1101/2024.05.13.24307238 medRxiv
Show abstract

The intricate interplay between somatic mutations and copy number alterations critically influences tumour evolution and patient prognosis. However, traditional genomic analyses often treat these alterations independently, overlooking gene mutant dosage -- a key emergent property of their interaction. Here, we develop an innovative computational framework that infers allele-specific copy number alterations directly from clinical targeted sequencing panels without requiring matched normal samples. Using this approach, we derived gene mutant dosage statistics for over 500,000 mutations across 60,000 clinical samples spanning 39 cancer types. By stratifying more than 20,000 patients according to mutant dosage across multiple oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes, we identified 46 tumour type-specific biomarkers predictive of overall survival. Notably, 13 of these biomarkers across 12 tumour types were undetectable using standard binary mutant/wild-type models. Additionally, 26 biomarkers were recurrently associated with metastatic spread in 10 tumour types, and 24 predicted organ-specific metastatic tropism in 6 tumour types. Alongside confirming known roles for established oncogenes and tumour suppressors, our method reveals, for the first time, gene mutant dosage patterns as independent predictors of prognosis, metastatic potential, and site-specific dissemination across diverse solid tumours. This augmented insight into genomic drivers enhances our understanding of cancer progression and metastasis, holding the potential to foster biomarker discovery significantly.

Published in Nature Genetics (predicted rank #29) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.