Back

Comprehensive Usability Evaluation and Performance Overview of Pathpoint Outcomes Software

Subramaniyan, B.; Mahapatra, P.; Mohamud, M.; Naqvi, A.

2024-05-13 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2024.05.11.24307045 medRxiv
Show abstract

This research evaluates the usability of Pathpoint(R) Outcomes Software, aligning with IEC 62366-1:2015 standards to ensure rigour and accuracy. The study involved diverse user groups like Healthcare Professionals and the General Population to provide varied perspectives. The study focused on the softwares usability, safety, and effectiveness, which are crucial to user experience, satisfaction, and performance. Any potential risks to users or patient data were identified to ensure safety standards. The softwares effectiveness was assessed, considering its accuracy, reliability, and efficiency. The study used both quantitative metrics and qualitative feedback for a balanced evaluation. It also aimed to identify and mitigate potential use errors, enhancing the softwares usability, safety, and effectiveness.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.