Back

Green microwave-assisted extraction of Euphorbia guyoniana: Optimization, metabolite profile and in vivo anti-inflammatory potential

Issaadi, H. M.; Bachir, Y. N.; Naama, A. B.; Aiter, I.; Szori, K.; Hunyadi, A.

2024-05-14 plant biology
10.1101/2024.05.10.593649 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study aimed to optimize microwave-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from undervalued traditional plant Euphorbia guyoniana (Boiss. & Reut.) using central composite design of response surface methodology. The independent variables were extraction time (x1: 5 - 25 min), ethanol concentration in the extractive solvent (x2: 30 - 70%), microwave power (x3: 180 - 800 Watt) and feed-to-solvent ratio (x4: 1:7.5 - 1:17.5) while dependent variables were total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC). Extract obtained by using the optimal extraction parameters was evaluated for its in vivo anti-inflammatory activity by the carrageenan-induced paw edema model and was subjected to RP-HPLC-PDA-ESI-MS analysis to investigate the presence of phenolic compounds. The optimal conditions for highest TPC (377.22 {+/-} 5.42 mg GAE/100g) and TFC (184.40 {+/-} 1.18 mg QE/100g) were obtained at extraction time of 25 min, ethanol concentration of 40.57%, microwave power of 450 Watt and feed-to-solvent ratio of 1:17.5. The quadratic models significantly (p < 0.0001) fitted the experimental data with R2 values of 0.984 and 0.970 for TPC and TFC, respectively. Optimal extract of Euphorbia guyoniana significantly higher inhibited carrageenan induced inflammation with a concentration of 50 mg/kg (75,98%) when compared with reference anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen (43,77%). Finally, above the previously reported phenolic constituents, i.e, quercetin and kaempferol derivatives, hydroxycinnamates have been identified for the first time in Euphorbia guyoniana plant extract.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.