Back

Disulfide constrained Fabs overcome target size limitation for high-resolution single-particle cryo-EM

Kung, J. E.; Johnson, M. C.; Jao, C. C.; Arthur, C. P.; Tegunov, D.; Rohou, A.; Sudhamsu, J.

2024-05-13 biophysics
10.1101/2024.05.10.593593 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-resolution structures of proteins are critical to understanding molecular mechanisms of biological processes and in the discovery of therapeutic molecules. Cryo-EM has revolutionized structure determination of large proteins and their complexes1, but a vast majority of proteins that underlie human diseases are small (< 50 kDa) and usually beyond its reach due to low signal-to-noise images and difficulties in particle alignment2. Current strategies to overcome this problem increase the overall size of small protein targets using scaffold proteins that bind to the target, but are limited by inherent flexibility and not being bound to their targets in a rigid manner, resulting in the target being poorly resolved compared to the scaffolds3-11. Here we present an iteratively engineered molecular design for transforming Fabs (antibody fragments), into conformationally rigid scaffolds (Rigid-Fabs) that, when bound to small proteins ([~]20 kDa), can enable high-resolution structure determination using cryo-EM. This design introduces multiple disulfide bonds at strategic locations, generates a well-folded Fab constrained into a rigid conformation and can be applied to Fabs from various species, isotypes and chimeric Fabs. We present examples of the Rigid Fab design enabling high-resolution (2.3-2.5 [A]) structures of small proteins, Ang2 (26 kDa) and KRAS (21 kDa) by cryo-EM. The strategies for designing disulfide constrained Rigid Fabs in our work thus establish a general approach to overcome the target size limitation of single particle cryo-EM.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 13%
12.5%
3
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
6
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
8
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
12
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
13
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
16
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
17
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
18
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
22
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
23
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%