Reconstructing parent genomes using siblings and other relatives
Qiao, Y.; Jewett, E. M.; McManus, K. F.; Freyman, W. A.; Curran, J. E.; Williams-Blangero, S.; Blangero, J.; The 23andMe Research Team, ; Williams, A. L.
Show abstract
Reconstructing the DNA of ancestors from their descendants has the potential to empower phenotypic analyses (including association and genetic nurture studies), improve pedigree reconstruction, and shed light on the ancestral population and phenotypes of ancestors. We developed HAPI-RECAP, a method that reconstructs the DNA of parents from full siblings and their relatives. This tool leverages HAPI2s output, a new phasing approach that applies to siblings (and optionally one or both parents) and reliably infers parent haplotypes but does not link the ungenotyped parents DNA across chromosomes or between segments flanking ambiguities. By combining IBD between the reconstructed parents and the relatives, HAPI-RECAP resolves the source parent of these segments. Moreover, the method exploits crossovers the children inherited and sex-specific genetic maps to infer the reconstructed parents sexes. We validated these methods on research participants from both 23andMe, Inc. and the San Antonio Mexican American Family Studies. Given data for one parent, HAPI2 reconstructs large fractions of the missing parents DNA, between 77.6% and 99.97% among all families, and 90.3% on average in three- and four-child families. When reconstructing both parents, HAPI-RECAP inferred between 33.2% and 96.6% of the parents genotypes, averaging 70.6% in four-child families. Reconstructed genotypes have average error rates < 10-3, or comparable to those from direct genotyping. HAPI-RECAP inferred the parent sexes 100% correctly given IBD-linked segments and can also reconstruct parents without any IBD. As datasets grow in size, more families will be implicitly collected; HAPI-RECAP holds promise to enable high quality parent genotype reconstruction.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.