Deep learning-based reconstruction of embryonic cell-division cycle from label-free microscopy time-series of evolutionarily diverse nematodes
Khatri, D.; Athale, C. A.
10.1101/2024.05.09.593369 bioRxivShow abstract
Microscopy of cellular dynamics during embryogenesis of non-model organisms can be tech- nically challenging due to limitations of molecular labelling methods. Label-free differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy of the first embryonic cell division of nematodes related to Caenorhabditis elegans has been successfully employed to examine the constraints and divergence of intra-cellular mechanisms during this asymmetric cell division. However, identifying stages of the cell division cycle were performed interactively, pointing to a need to automate of cell stage identification from DIC microscopy. To this end, we have trained deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), both pre-existing such as ResNet, VGGNet and EfficientNet, and a customized shallow network, EvoCellNet, to automatically classify first-embryonic division into the stages: (i) pro-nuclear migration and (ii) centration and rotation, (iii) spindle elongation and (iv) cytokinesis, with all networks performing with 91% or greater accuracy. The activations of the networks superimposed on the images result in segmentation-free detection of intracellular features such as pro-nuclei, spindle and spindle- poles in case of the shallow EvoCellNet, while ResNet, VGGNet and and EfficientNet detect large-scale, features that are less biologically meaningful. The UMAP space representation combined with support vector machines (SVM) allows for stage boundary identification and recovers a cyclical map connecting the states (i) to (iv) of the division. This approach could be used to automate quantification of cell division stages and sub-cellular dynamics without explicit labelling in label-free microscopy. SummaryWe have trained multiple convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify the stages of cell division from the first embryonic division of diverse nematodes, evolutionarily related to Caenorhabditis elegans. We find two classifiers, VggNet and a customized EvoCellNet, can detect intracellular features and a UMAP representation can reconstruct the cyclical progression of first embryonic division from related species.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A deep learning approach for staging embryonic tissue isolates with small data 97%
- Caveolae and scaffold detection from single molecule localization microscopy data using deep learning 96%
- Semantic Segmentation of HeLa Cells: An Objective Comparison between one Traditional Algorithm and Three Deep-Learning Architectures 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre-training artificial neural networks with spontaneous retinal activity improves motion prediction in natural scenes 95%
- A Deep Learning approach for time-consistent cell cycle phase prediction from microscopy data 95%
- Multiple neural network approaches, including use of topological data analysis, enhances classification of human induced pluripotent stem cell colonies by treatment condition 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- HematoNet: Expert Level Classification of Bone Marrow Cytology Morphology in Hematological Malignancy with Deep Learning 94%
- EmbryoTempoFormer: clip-based developmental tempo inference from zebrafish brightfield time-lapse microscopy 90%
- Federated Learning for Predicting Compound Mechanism of Action Based on Image-data from Cell Painting 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- CellBinDB: A Large-Scale Multimodal Annotated Dataset for Cell Segmentation with Benchmarking of Universal Models 96%
- SpheroScan: A User-Friendly Deep Learning Tool for Spheroid Image Analysis 95%
- ChronoRoot: High-throughput phenotyping by deep segmentation networks reveals novel temporal parameters of plant root system architecture 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.