Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antidiabetic drugs initiation in Sweden, an interrupted time series study
Khanyk, N.; Nyberg, F.; Wettermark, B.; Li, H.; Eeg-Olofsson, K.; Gudbjornsdottir, S.; Hajiebrahimi, M.
Show abstract
AimTo investigate the impact of the COVID-19-pandemic on antidiabetic drug initiation MethodsUsing Swedish national health registers, an interrupted time series study for all first-time dispensed antidiabetic drugs was performed. A minimum 14-month washout period was used. We calculated monthly cumulative incidence of antidiabetic drug initiations per 1000 population and estimated trends before and after the onset of the pandemic using segmented regression analysis. ResultsAmong 167,889 participants between 1Mar2019 and 30Nov2021, male sex (53%), age 18-64 (55.3%), unmarried status (52.5%), upper secondary education level (46.2%), and being employed (53.5%) were the most frequent characteristics. Mar2020, there was an immediate level drop in antidiabetic drug initiation ({beta}2=-0.087%, P=0.01); however, the trend exhibited a rapid increase thereafter. Significant immediate level drops were identified for DPP4i (-0.087%, P=0.01), GLP1a (-0.008%, P=0.01) and SGLT2i (-0.033%, P=0.003). Older people ([≥]65) showed the largest immediate drop for antidiabetic drug initiation (-0.272%, P=0.003). SGLT2i demonstrated an increasing pattern both before and after the pandemic while metformin did reveal an increasing pattern among patients [≥]65 years old after the pandemic. ConclusionThe results identified an immediate level drop at the onset of the pandemic for any antidiabetic drug initiation, but the trend increased rapidly thereafter.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from administrative data: a population-based cohort study from Italy 93%
- Effect of common maintenance drugs on the risk and severity of COVID-19 in elderly patients 93%
- Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Clinical outcomes due to COVID-19. Protocol of a systematic literature review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT-2 inhibitors in overweight/obese patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 94%
- Cohort profile: The Nanjing Diabetes Cohort database – a population-based surveillance cohort 93%
- Replicating a COVID-19 study in a national England database to assess the generalisability of research with regional electronic health record data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic inequalities and diabetes complications: An analysis of administrative data from Hungary 92%
- Mortality Disparity By Socioeconomic Position In People With And Without Diabetes: Open Cohort Studies In Four High-Income Countries 91%
- A regression discontinuity analysis of the social distancing recommendations for older adults in Sweden during COVID-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential impact of Covid-19 on incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in acute, post-acute and long Covid-19: population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom 91%
- Rapid Epidemiological Analysis of Comorbidities and Treatments as risk factors for COVID-19 in Scotland (REACT-SCOT): a population-based case-control study 91%
- Sociodemographic Characteristics and Longitudinal Progression of Multimorbidity: A Multistate Modelling Analysis of a Large Primary Care Records Dataset in England 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Awareness, knowledge and trust in the Greek authorities towards COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Epirus Health Study cohort 92%
- COVID19-related and all-cause mortality among middle-aged and older adults across the first epidemic wave of SARS-COV-2 infection in the region of Tarragona, Spain: results from the COVID19 TARRACO Cohort Study, March-June 2020 91%
- Onset of effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 worldwide 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.