Back

Effect of muscarinic blockade on the speed of attention shifting and learning

Thiele, A.; McDonald Milner, A.; Hall, C.; Mayhew, L.; Carter, A.; Sanjeev, S.

2024-05-08 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.05.08.593141 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The study aimed to investigate to what extent blockade of muscarinic receptors affects the speed of endogenous versus exogenous attentional shift times, and how it affects learning induced improvements of attention shift times. Subjects viewed an array of 10 moving clocks and reported the time a clock indicated when cued. Target clocks were indicated by peripheral or central cues, including conditions of pre-cuing. This allowed assessing shift times when attention was pre-allocated, when peripheral cues triggered exogenous attention shifts, and when central cues triggered endogenous attention shifts. In study 1, each subject participated in 2 sessions (scopolamine/placebo), whereby the order of drug intake was counterbalanced across subjects, and subjects were blinded to conditions. Scopolamine/placebo was administered before a psychophysical experiment was conducted. In study 2, the effect of muscarinic blockade on learning induced improvements of attention shift times was investigated. Here scopolamine/placebo was administered immediately after the first (of two) psychophysical sessions, whereby a given subject either received scopolamine or placebo pills. Confirming previous results, we show that pre-cuing resulted in the fastest shift times, followed by exogenous cuing, with endogenous attentional shifts being slowest. Scopolamine application increased attentional shift times across all 3 conditions compared to placebo, but in a dose dependent manner. Additionally, blockade of muscarinic receptors immediately after the first session reduced learning dependent improvement of attention shift times. These results demonstrate that muscarinic receptors play an important role in attention shifting, and they contribute to learning of attention shifting.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.1%
2
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
17
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%