Back

Influence of environmental and biological factors on functional connectivity of the superior temporal sulcus in neonates scanned at term age

Mancuso, C.; Bacquet, M.; Benjamin, L.; Leroy, F.; Dehaene-Lambertz, G.

2024-05-07 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.05.07.592881 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The superior temporal sulcus (STS), one of the first sulci visible during brain development, is a key region for human communication, notably hosting linguistic functions in the left hemisphere. Fetuses and premature newborns already process external sound, but the auditory environment is vastly different in-utero and ex-utero. Does this have an impact on the development of the auditory and linguistic networks? To answer this question, we studied the functional connectivity of regions bordering the STS, delimited in each individual including full-term and preterm male and female neonates born at different gestational ages but all scanned at term. We found that in addition to the expected contralateral connectivity, various STS parts were more strongly connected to specific distant regions, revealing the typical auditory/linguistic division across the two banks of the STS reported in adults. Furthermore, the right posterior STS was more connected to the contralateral hemisphere than the left. Finally, sex and premature birth had effects on both STS volume and connectivity. Female neonates displayed a lesser left-right asymmetry in STS depth, and heightened connectivity from the left posterior STS compared to males. Most importantly, despite equivalent scan age, full-term newborns had deeper sulci compared with preterms, and local connectivity in the right temporal region increased linearly with gestation length. These results emphasize the impact of both sex and early auditory environment on the setting up of the cerebral networks that might contribute to explain the milder impact of premature birth on language in females.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.