Trophic adaptation of large terrestrial omnivores to global change
Albrecht, J.; Bocherens, H.; Hobson, K. A.; Drucker, D. G.; Sergiel, A.; Swenson, J. E.; Zedrosser, A.; Marciszak, A.; Iregren, E.; Drenzel, L.; Kysely, R.; Lipecki, G.; Makowiecki, D.; Wagner, J.; Zwijacz-Kozica, T.; Fritz, S. A.; Revilla, E.; Selva, N.
Show abstract
Large omnivores at the top of food webs play a key role in ecosystems, as their ability to feed on multiple trophic levels stabilizes food-web dynamics and impacts ecosystem functioning. However, it is largely unexplored how large omnivores adapt their trophic interactions to altered resource availability under global change, particularly in terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we combine macroecological and paleoecological approaches and reveal that extant bears, the largest terrestrial omnivores, adapt their trophic position in food webs dynamically to net primary productivity and growing season length. Throughout their geographic ranges, extant bears occupy higher trophic positions in unproductive ecosystems with short growing seasons than in productive ecosystems with long growing seasons. Consistent with this geographic pattern, the trophic position of the brown bear sharply decreased at the transition from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene, coinciding with an increase in net primary productivity and growing season length. These findings demonstrate that trophic interactions of omnivores are not static but change dynamically in response to environmental change. Our findings suggest that global change impacts on primary production and vegetation seasonality may trigger shifts in the functional role of omnivores, with consequences for food webs and ecosystem functions. Significance statementLarge omnivores play a key role in ecosystems, as they stabilize food-web dynamics and impact ecosystem functioning. However, how omnivores adapt their trophic interactions to changes in resource availability under global change remains unexplored. Combining macroecological and paleoecological approaches, we show that extant bears, the largest terrestrial omnivores, occupy lower trophic positions in food webs as net primary productivity and growing season length increase. This trophic adaptation is evident across the geographic ranges of all extant terrestrial bear species and for brown bears at the transition from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene. Therefore, impacts of global change on primary production and vegetation seasonality may trigger shifts in the functional role of omnivores, with consequences for food webs and ecosystems. One sentence summaryGlobal changes in primary productivity and vegetation seasonality alter the functional role of large omnivores in terrestrial ecosystems.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Holocene environmental change on the evolutionary ecology of an Arctic top predator 97%
- Local increases in admixture with hunter-gatherers followed the initial expansion of Neolithic farmers across continental Europe 95%
- Warmer temperatures favor slower-growing bacteria in natural marine communities 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Migratory herbivorous waterfowl track multiple resource waves during spring migration 94%
- The preeminent role of directional selection in generating extreme morphological change in Glyptodonts (Cingulata; Xenarthra) 93%
- Social and spatial drivers of the multitiered structure of zebra finch social networks 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconstructing the spatiotemporal patterns of admixture during the European Holocene using a novel genomic dating method 94%
- Hybridization alters the shape of the genotypic fitness landscape, increasing access to novel fitness peaks during adaptive radiation 93%
- Landing force reveals new form of motion-induced sound camouflage in a wild predator. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.