Back

Factors associated with utilization of preconception Sickle cell screening among women receiving antenatal care at Hoima regional referral hospital, Uganda.

Kyakuha, S.; Scovia, M. G.; Mugenyi, N.; Twineamatsiko, A.

2024-05-08 public and global health
10.1101/2024.05.07.24306985 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionGlobally, it is estimated that over 300,000 babies are born with Sickle cell disease annually, yet the uptake of preconception sickle cell screening services is at 25% among the total population that become pregnant every year. In Uganda, about 20,000 babies are born annually but with a low utilization rate of Pre-Conception Sickle cell screening services among women at 11%. This study aimed at determining the utilization rate and factors associated with preconception sickle cell screening among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Hoima regional referral hospital, Uganda. MethodologyA hospital-based cross-section study was done, systematic sampling used, and participants subjected to a semi-structured questionnaire. 334 participants were recruited, and data was collected, entered into Epidata, and analyzed using STATA version 14. Study findingsThe utilization rate of Pre-Conception Sickle cell screening services among women receiving Ante Natal Care was at 11.4%. There was a significant association between womans level of education, marital status, partners support and knowledge towards Pre-Conception Sickle cell screening services. ConclusionsThe utilization rate of Pre-Conception Sickle cell screening services is low with level of education, marital status, and having familial history of sickle cell disease, partner support and awareness being significant associated factors. RecommendationThere is need to empower women to attain a formal education through adult literacy programs, massive sensitization and conducting regular health talks regarding Pre-Conception Sickle cell screening services.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.