Evaluating the Potential of Metastatic Mediastinal Lymph Node Involvement in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients through Convolutional Neural Networks Analysis of Chest CT
Shevtsov, A. E.; Tominin, I. D.; Tominin, V. D.; Malevanniy, V. M.; Esakov, Y. S.; Tukvadze, Z.; Nefedov, A. O.; Yablonskiy, P.; Gavrilov, P.; Kozlov, V. V.; Blokhina, M. E.; Nalivkina, E. A.; Gombolevskiy, V. A.; Dugova, M. V.; Chernina, V. Y.; Vasilev, Y. A.; Omelyanskaya, O. V.; Reshetnikov, R. V.; Blokhin, I. A.; Belyaev, M. G.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWLung cancer is the second most common type of cancer worldwide, making up about 20% of all cancer deaths with less than 10% 5-year survival rate for the very late stage. The recent guidelines for the most common non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) type recommend performing staging based on the 8th edition of TNM classification, where the mediastinal lymph node involvement plays a key role. However, most of the non-invasive methods have a very limited level of sensitivity and are relatively accurate, but invasive methods can be contradicted for some patients. Current advances in Deep Learning show great potential in solving such problems. Still, most of these works focus on the algorithmic side of the problem, not the clinical relevance. Moreover, none of them addressed individual lymph node malignancy classification problem, restricting the indirect analysis of the whole study, and limiting the interpretability of the result without giving an option for cliniciansto validate the result. This work mitigates these gaps, proposing a multi-step algorithm for each visible mediastinal lymph node segmentation and assessing the probability of its involvement in themetastatic process, using the results of histological verification on training. The developed pipelineshows 0.74 {+/-} 0.01 average Recall with 0.53 {+/-} 0.26 object Dice Score for the clinically relevant lymph nodes segmentation task and 0.73 ROC AUC for patients N-stage prediction, outperformingtraditional size-based criteria.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effective Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting COVID-19 Outcomes from Chest Computed Tomography Volumes 97%
- Segmentation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding vessels in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks and Texture Descriptors 95%
- On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 95%
- Selective ensemble methods for deep learning segmentation of major vessels in invasive coronary angiography 94%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The mathematics of erythema: Development of machine learning models for artificial intelligence assisted measurement and severity scoring of radiation induced dermatitis 95%
- Two-Step Machine Learning to Diagnose and Predict Involvement of Lungs in COVID-19 and Pneumonia using CT Radiomics 94%
- Fusion of Electronic Health Records and Radiographic Images for a Multimodal Deep Learning Prediction Model of Atypical Femur Fractures 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.