Back

Evaluating the Potential of Metastatic Mediastinal Lymph Node Involvement in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients through Convolutional Neural Networks Analysis of Chest CT

Shevtsov, A. E.; Tominin, I. D.; Tominin, V. D.; Malevanniy, V. M.; Esakov, Y. S.; Tukvadze, Z.; Nefedov, A. O.; Yablonskiy, P.; Gavrilov, P.; Kozlov, V. V.; Blokhina, M. E.; Nalivkina, E. A.; Gombolevskiy, V. A.; Dugova, M. V.; Chernina, V. Y.; Vasilev, Y. A.; Omelyanskaya, O. V.; Reshetnikov, R. V.; Blokhin, I. A.; Belyaev, M. G.

2024-05-09 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.05.07.24304092 medRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWLung cancer is the second most common type of cancer worldwide, making up about 20% of all cancer deaths with less than 10% 5-year survival rate for the very late stage. The recent guidelines for the most common non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) type recommend performing staging based on the 8th edition of TNM classification, where the mediastinal lymph node involvement plays a key role. However, most of the non-invasive methods have a very limited level of sensitivity and are relatively accurate, but invasive methods can be contradicted for some patients. Current advances in Deep Learning show great potential in solving such problems. Still, most of these works focus on the algorithmic side of the problem, not the clinical relevance. Moreover, none of them addressed individual lymph node malignancy classification problem, restricting the indirect analysis of the whole study, and limiting the interpretability of the result without giving an option for cliniciansto validate the result. This work mitigates these gaps, proposing a multi-step algorithm for each visible mediastinal lymph node segmentation and assessing the probability of its involvement in themetastatic process, using the results of histological verification on training. The developed pipelineshows 0.74 {+/-} 0.01 average Recall with 0.53 {+/-} 0.26 object Dice Score for the clinically relevant lymph nodes segmentation task and 0.73 ROC AUC for patients N-stage prediction, outperformingtraditional size-based criteria.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.