Back

Quick, Don't Move!: Wh-Movement and Wh-In-Situ Structures in Rapid Parallel Reading - EEG studies in English, Urdu, and Mandarin Chinese

Chacon, D. A.; Dunagan, D. G.; McLendon, J.; Khokhar, H.; Hoque, Z.

2024-05-08 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.05.06.592830 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A fundamental question in the cognitive neuroscience of language is how grammatical representations are reflected in the organization and activity of the brain. This is challenging in part because superficial differences between languages, e.g., word order, exert different demands on the memory systems that process these structures. Here, we present an electroencephalography (EEG) study to investigate the brains responses to wh-constructions in English, Urdu, and Mandarin Chinese. In addition to the different word orders, writing systems, and morphological typologies of the 3 languages, these languages diverge with regard to how wh-constructions are formed: English requires filler-gap dependencies for wh-objects, whereas Urdu and Mandarin Chinese do not. We use a rapid parallel reading task, in which short sentences are displayed in parallel for 200ms to mitigate the different demands placed on memory systems. We show that neural responses distinguish wh-object constructions from their controls in midline anterior (Urdu, Mandarin Chinese) and right posterior sensors (English, Mandarin Chinese), from 200-400ms (English, Mandarin Chinese) and 500-800ms (English, Urdu). Although there is no detectable uniform, language-invariant response to wh-constructions across languages, there are a number of shared features in the evoked response between any pair of languages, i.e., wh-in-situ constructions generate an evoked response in midline anterior sensors. Moreover, behavioral evidence shows a robust cross-language cost of processing wh-object constructions, regardless of their surface form. This demonstrates that readers of diverse languages can process some grammatical information in a short 200ms fixation, and that the RPVP methodology may enable new ways of linking cognitive neuroscience of language to comparative syntax, i.e., the systematic description of similarities and differences between grammatical structures.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
2
Neurobiology of Language
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
4
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.0%
6
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
7
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.3%
8
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
10
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
11
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
12
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.3%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
17
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
19
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
21
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.0%
26
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
27
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%