Back

Sex-specific dominance and its effects on allelic diversity in sexually antagonistic loci

Siljestam, M.; Rueffler, C.; Arnqvist, G.

2024-05-07 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.05.06.592709 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sexually antagonistic (SA) selection, favouring different alleles in males and females, can contribute to the maintenance of genetic diversity. Current theory predicts that biallelic polymorphism can be maintained in SA loci under strong selection or dominance reversal in the sexes. Yet, selection should often be weak, several candidate SA loci harbour more than two segregating alleles and dominance reversal may not be common. We present a general model to explore the evolution of alleles at autosomal and X-linked loci under SA selection, affecting a quantitative trait with distinct female and male optima. We confirm that additive allelic effects predict biallelic polymorphism, but only under symmetric and relatively strong selection. However, polyallelic polymorphism can evolve under conditions of sex-specific or X-linked dominance for the trait, particularly under weak selection, such that several alleles coexist in a single population through balancing selection. Our analysis furthermore shows that sex-specific dominance and X-linked dominance evolve when permitted, thus polyallelic polymorphism is a likely evolutionary outcome. We conclude that SA selection can drive the co-evolution of differences in dominance between the sexes and polyallelic polymorphism, particularly under weak selection, an outcome reducing the gender load. To assess these findings, we analyse segregating variation in three populations of an insect model system and find that (1) loci with the strongest signal of polyallelic polymorphism are enriched with functions associated with known SA phenotypes and (2) both candidate SA loci and loci exhibiting sex-specific dominance show a stronger signal of polyallelic polymorphism.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.1%
2
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
3
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
4
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
8
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
9
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.8%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
12
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
13
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
24
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%