Back

Metabolic enzymes moonlight as selective autophagy receptors to protect plants against viral-induced cellular damage

Clavel, M.; Bianchi, A.; Kobylinska, R.; Groh, R.; Ma, J.; Papareddy, R. K.; Grujic, N.; Picchianti, L.; Stewart, E.; Schutzbier, M.; Stejskal, K.; de la Concepcion, J. C.; Hernandez, V. S. d. M.; Voichek, Y.; Clauw, P.; Gunis, J.; Durnberger, G.; Muelders, J. C.; Grimm, A.; Sedivy, A.; Erhardt, M.; Vyboishchikov, V.; Gao, P.; Lechner, E.; Vantard, E.; Jez, J.; Roitinger, E.; Genschik, P.; Kang, B.-H.; Dagdas, Y.

2024-05-06 plant biology Community evaluation
10.1101/2024.05.06.590709 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractRNA viruses co-opt the host endomembrane system and organelles to build replication complexes for infection. How the host responds to these membrane perturbations is poorly understood. Here, we explore the autophagic response of Arabidopsis thaliana to three viruses that hijack different cellular compartments. Autophagy is significantly induced within systemically infected tissues, its disruption rendering plants highly sensitive to infection. Contrary to being an antiviral defense mechanism as previously suggested, quantitative analyses of the viral loads established autophagy as a tolerance pathway. Further analysis of one of these viruses, the Turnip Crinkle Virus (TCV) that hijack mitochondria, showed that despite perturbing mitochondrial integrity, TCV does not trigger a typical mitophagy response. Instead, TCV and Turnip yellow mosaic virus (TYMV) infection activates a distinct selective autophagy mechanism, where oligomeric metabolic enzymes moonlight as selective autophagy receptors and degrade key executors of defense and cell death such as EDS1. Altogether, our study reveals an autophagy-regulated metabolic rheostat that gauges cellular integrity during viral infection and degrades cell death executors to avoid catastrophic amplification of immune signaling.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.