Back

Placental and Immune Cell DNA Methylation Reference Panel for Bulk Tissue Cell Composition

Campbell, K. A.; Colacino, J. A.; Dou, J.; Dolinoy, D. C.; Park, S. K.; Loch-Caruso, R.; Padmanabhan, V.; Bakulski, K.

2024-05-09 genomics
10.1101/2024.05.06.588886 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To distinguish DNA methylation (DNAm) from cell proportion changes in whole placental tissue research, we developed a robust cell type-specific DNAm reference to estimate cell composition. We collated newly collected and existing cell type DNAm profiles quantified via Illumina EPIC or 450k microarrays. To estimate cell composition, we deconvoluted whole placental samples (n=36) with robust partial correlation based on the top 50 hyper- and hypomethylated sites per cell type. To test deconvolution performance, we evaluated RMSE in predicting principal component one of DNAm variation in 204 external placental samples. We analyzed DNAm profiles (n=368,435 sites) from 12 cell types: cytotrophoblasts (n=18), endothelial cells (n=19), Hofbauer cells (n=26), stromal cells (n=21), syncytiotrophoblasts (n=4), six lymphocyte types (n=36), and nucleated red blood cells (n=11). Median cell composition was consistent with placental biology: 60.4% syncytiotrophoblast, 17.1% stromal, 8.8% endothelial, 4.5% cytotrophoblast, 3.9% Hofbauer, 1.7% nucleated red blood cells, and 1.2% neutrophils. Our expanded reference outperformed an existing reference in predicting DNAm variation (15.4% variance explained, IQR=21.61) with cell composition estimates (RMSE:10.51 vs. 11.43, p-value<0.001). This cell type reference can robustly estimate cell composition from whole placental DNAm data to detect important cell types, reveal biological mechanisms, and improve casual inference.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epigenetics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Epigenomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
3
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.0%
4
Placenta
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.2%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.2%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
9
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.7%
14
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
20
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
23
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
RNA Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%