Immunogenicity and Safety of Gamma, Omicron BA.4/5 and Bivalent SARS-CoV-2 RBD-based Protein Booster Vaccines in Adults Previously Immunized with Different Vaccine Platforms: a Phase II/III, Randomized, Clinical Trial.
Perez-Marc, G.; Coria, L. M.; Ceballos, A.; Rodriguez, J. M.; Lombardo, M. E.; Bruno, L.; Paez Cordoba, F.; Fascetto Cassero, C. G.; Salvatori, M.; Rios Medrano, M. A.; Fulgenzi, F. R.; Alzogaray, M. F.; Mykietiuk, A.; Uriarte, I. L.; Itcovici, N.; Smith Casabella, T. E.; Corral, G.; Bruno, M. E.; Roldan, O.; Nunez, S. A.; Cahn, F.; Bianchi, A.; Braem, V. M.; Christmann, A.; Corradetti, S.; Darraidou, M. C.; Di Nunzio, L.; Estrada, T. B.; Lopez Castelo, R.; Marchionatti, C. G.; Pitocco, L.; Trias Uriarte, V. M.; Wood, C. J.; Zadoff, R.; Bues, F.; Garrido, R. M.; Laboratorio Pablo Cassara group
Show abstract
BackgroundThis study (ARVAC-F2-3-002) assessed the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of a recombinant booster vaccine (ARVAC) containing the receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein in three different versions: Gamma (ARVACGamma), Omicron BA.4/5 (ARVACOmicron), and Gamma/Omicron Bivalent (ARVACBivalent). MethodsRandomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled, multicenter (11 centers in Argentina) Phase II/III trial including adult volunteers previously vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 with [≤]3 booster doses. Participants were randomized to receive ARVACGamma (50 {micro}g)+placebo and vice-versa (1:1 ratio) (Phase II), and ARVACGamma (50 {micro}g)+placebo, ARVACOmicron (50 {micro}g)+placebo, and ARVACBivalent (Gamma/Omicron 25 {micro}g/25 {micro}g)+placebo and vice-versa (Phase III) (1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio) 28 days apart. The primary endpoint was the seroconversion rate of neutralizing antibodies compared to placebo. The vaccine immunogenicity was considered acceptable at >75% seroconversion rate to variants homologous to the antigen contained in the vaccine (prespecified primary endpoint). ResultsParticipants (n=2012) (mean 48.2 years, SD 16.7; 48.1% women) were randomized and allocated to ARVACGamma (n=232 in Phase II and n=592 in Phase III), ARVACOmicron (n=594), and ARVACBivalent (n=594); 232 in Phase II and 370 in each Phase III group were included in the immunogenicity subset. Seroconversion rates to all SARS-CoV-2 variants were significantly higher after receiving any vaccine than placebo. All vaccine versions met the prespecified primary endpoint in all participants and in those 18-60 years old. In participants >60 years, the ARVACOmicron and the ARVACBivalent met the prespecified primary endpoint, whereas the ARVACGamma did not. The ARVACBivalent induced seroconversion rates were significantly higher than 75% across all tested SARS- CoV-2 variants (homologous and heterologous) and age groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were recorded; most local and systemic adverse events were grade 1-2. ConclusionBooster vaccination with Gamma, Omicron BA.4/5, and Bivalent protein subunit recombinant ARVAC vaccine versions elicited protective neutralizing antibody responses to several SARS-CoV-2 variants, with very low reactogenicity and a favorable safety profile. Trial registration: NCT05752201
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multi-centre study 98%
- Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine formulations in healthy adults: a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study 98%
- Safety and immunogenicity clinical trial of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152 (a phase 2, double-blind, randomised controlled trial) and the persistence of immune responses from a phase 1 follow-up report 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: A Randomised, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial 98%
- Immunogenicity and Safety of Booster Dose of S-268019-b or Tozinameran in Japanese Participants: An Interim Report of Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study 97%
- Comparison of the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a reduced and standard booster dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults after two doses of inactivated vaccine 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 98%
- Post-vaccination neutralization responses to Omicron sub-variants 96%
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529): A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster with an RBD virus-like particle vaccine following two- or three-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccine 97%
- Interim Analysis of a Phase I Randomized Clinical Trial on the Safety and Immunogenicity of the mRNA-1283 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity of SCB-2019, an adjuvanted, recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S-protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine in healthy 12–17 year-old adolescents 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.