Back

Informatic tools for diagnosis in dentistry. A compilation review

Chaple Gil, A. M.; Damas, S. d. l. C.; Afrashtehfar, K. I.

2024-05-06 dentistry and oral medicine
10.1101/2024.05.05.24306900 medRxiv
Show abstract

The objective of this study was to compile the computer tools available in the scientific literature aimed at diagnosis in dentistry. A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Were include, original researches type articles, Articles that reported the usefulness of a computer/technological tool that helps diagnosis in dental practice, Articles published in the last 20 years (period 2004-2024) and written in English and Spanish. Online tool Rayyan(R) was used to establish homogeneity in the review of the authors on a single online platform where they had access and could centralize the results. Variables were extracted from the articles included in the study. In total, 12648 records were retrieved from the database. After decantation, 39 reports described 36 computer tools used for diagnosis in dentistry. More informatic tools related to "Restorative Dentistry have been developed than the rest of the specialties 14 (40%). Python was the predominant programming language, 83.3% of the tools were validated, and 27.8% were free. Informatics tools in dentistry enhance the diagnosis and treatment planning. However, a robust regulatory framework is required for validation prior to clinical implementation. Continuous training of dental professionals using these technologies is crucial to maximize their benefits and ensure optimal patient care. More research is needed to explore the potential of informatics applications in dentistry, their integration into existing health systems, and their accessibility in resource-limited areas.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.