Homologous recombination promotes mitotic death to suppress the innate immune response
Szmyd, R.; Casolin, S.; French, L.; Gonzalez Manjon, A.; Dhawan, A.; Nelson, C. B.; Cavalli, L.; Page, S. G.; Hau, E.; Pickett, H. A.; Gee, H. E.; Cesare, A. J.
Show abstract
Double strand breaks (DSBs) can initiate mitotic catastrophe, a complex oncosuppressive phenomenon characterized by cell death during or after cell division. Through single-cell analysis of extended live imaging, we unveiled how cell cycle-regulated DSB repair guides disparate mitotic catastrophe outcomes. Our data reveal that toxic double Holliday junctions (dHjs) generated during homologous recombination (HR) promote non-immunogenic intrinsic apoptosis in the immediate mitosis after S or G2-phase DSB induction. Conversely, the combined activity of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), microhomology mediated end joining (MMEJ), and single strand annealing (SSA) enable G1 phase cells to tolerate high DSB loads at the cost of aberrant cell division, innate immune response activation and delayed extrinsic lethality. Targeting NHEJ, MMEJ, or SSA promotes HR-dependent mitotic death, while suppressing mitotic death fosters a robust immunogenic response. Together the data indicate that a temporal repair hierarchy, coupled with cumulative DSB load, serves as a reliable predictor of mitotic catastrophe outcomes. In this pathway, HR suppress the innate immune response by promoting mitotic lethality.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Interaction mapping of endoplasmic reticulum ubiquitin ligases identifies modulators of innate immune signalling 96%
- linc-mipep and linc-wrb encode micropeptides that regulate chromatin accessibility in vertebrate-specific neural cells 96%
- Secreted antigen A peptidoglycan hydrolase is essential for Enterococcus faecium cell separation and priming of immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapy 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.