Back

The evolutionary history and functional specialization of microRNA genes in Arabidopsis halleri and A. lyrata

Flavia, P.; Azevedo Favory, J.; Lacoste, E.; Beaumont, C.; Louis, F.; Blassiau, C.; Cruaud, C.; Labadie, K.; Gallina, S.; Genete, M.; Kumar, V.; Kramer, U.; Adriano Batista, R.; Patiou, C.; Debacker, L.; Ponitzki, C.; Houze, E.; Durand, E.; Aury, J.-M.; Castric, V.; Legrand, S.

2024-05-05 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.05.03.592357 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs that play important regulatory roles in plant genomes. While some miRNA genes are deeply conserved, the majority appear to be species-specific, raising the question of how they emerge and integrate into cellular regulatory networks. To better understand this, we first performed a detailed annotation of miRNA genes in the closely related plants Arabidopsis halleri and A. lyrata and evaluated their phylogenetic conservation across 87 plant species. We then characterized the process by which newly emerged miRNA genes progressively acquire the properties of "canonical" miRNA genes, in terms of size and stability of the hairpin precursor, loading of their cleavage products into Argonaute proteins, and potential to regulate downstream target genes. Nucleotide polymorphism was lower in the mature miRNA sequence than in the other parts of the hairpin (stem, terminal loop), and the regions of coding sequences targeted by miRNAs also had reduced diversity as compared to their neighboring regions along the genes. These patterns were less pronounced for recently emerged than for evolutionarily conserved miRNA genes, suggesting a weaker selective constraint on the most recent miRNA genes. Our results illustrate the rapid birth-and-death of miRNA genes in plant genomes, and provide a detailed picture of the evolutionary processes by which a small fraction of them eventually integrate into "core" biological processes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.