Back

Analysis of auxin responses in the fern Ceratopteris richardii identifies tissue ontogeny as a major determinant for response properties

Woudenberg, S.; Dipp Alvarez, M.; Rienstra, J.; Levitsky, V.; Mironova, V.; Scarpella, E.; Kuhn, A.; Weijers, D.

2024-05-08 plant biology
10.1101/2024.05.03.592339 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The auxin signalling molecule regulates a range of plant growth and developmental processes. The core transcriptional machinery responsible for auxin-mediated responses is conserved across all land plants. Genetic, physiological and molecular exploration in bryophyte and angiosperm model species have shown both qualitative and quantitative differences in auxin responses. Given the highly divergent ontogeny of the dominant gametophyte (bryophytes) and sporophyte (angiosperms) generations, however, it is unclear whether such differences derive from distinct phylogeny or ontogeny. Here, we address this question by comparing a range of physiological, developmental and molecular responses to auxin in both generations of the model fern Ceratopteris richardii. We find that auxin response in Ceratopteris gametophytes closely resembles that of a thalloid bryophyte, whereas the sporophyte mimics auxin response in flowering plants. This resemblance manifests both at phenotypic and transcriptional level. Furthermore, we show that disrupting auxin transport can lead to ectopic sporophyte induction on the gametophyte, suggesting a role for auxin in the alternation of generations. Our study thus identifies ontogeny, rather than phylogeny, as a major determinant of auxin response properties in land plants. Summary statementStudies in angiosperms and bryophytes have left unresolved the roles of tissue ontogeny and species phylogeny in auxin response. We address that problem by characterizing auxin response in a fern.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.