Back

Exploring the genome-wide expression level of the bacterial strain belonging to Bacillus safensis (MM19) against Phomopsis viticola

Baysal, O.; Silme, R. S.; Can, A.; Kurum, Y.; Korkut, A.; KIRBOGA, K. K.; Cetinkaya, A.

2024-05-03 microbiology
10.1101/2024.05.03.592302 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionRhizobacteria has the suppression ability to compete with pathogenic microorganisms and help for plant immunity and defense mechanism. Their growth and survival in rhizosphere ensure biological balance in favor of the host plant. MethodsIn our study, with agar diffusion assays, we found a rhizobacterium species belonging to Bacillus safensis, which can significantly suppress Phomopsis viticola. To elucidate the antagonistic mechanism, genome-wide gene expression profiling of B. safensis (strain MM19) was performed in the presence and absence of P. viticola. We used RNA-seq analysis to obtain a comprehensive overview of the responsive B. safensis whole gene expression classified according to biological and metabolic process to P. viticola concomitant growth in liquid culture. ResultsThe differential gene expression profiles of B. safensis (MM19) revealed significantly increased expression of prominent genes related to thiamine biosynthesis involving various metabolites and enzymes that play role in the suppression of mycelium growth and pathogen inhibition. Correspondingly, the expression of three major genes (HOG1, FUS3, SGI) involving in the virulence of P. viticola was followed using qPCR analysis. HOG1 was the highest expressed gene in the pathogen when it co-cultivated with MM19. Based on these findings, we performed molecular docking and dynamics analysis to explore the interaction between HOG1 and thiamine, besides expression of network analysis constructed using Cytoscape. DiscussionThe results proved that the functional genomic data related to thiamine biosynthesis and corresponding pathways ensure a priming role in the antagonistic behavior of B. safensis (MM19) against P. viticola as a supporter for plant immunity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.5%
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
8.4%
4
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
8
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Microbial Pathogenesis
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
14
Archives of Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%