Back

High-resolution vector-borne disease infection risk mapping with Area-to-Point Poisson Kriging and Species Distribution Modeling

Molinski, S.

2024-05-04 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.05.03.24306806
Show abstract

BackgroundDisease infection data is usually aggregated and shared as a sum of infections in a given area over time. This data is presented as choropleth maps. The aggregation process protects privacy and simplifies decision-making but introduces visual bias for large areas and sparsely populated places. Moreover, aggregated areas of varying sizes cannot be simply used as the input for complex ecological models, which are based on data retrieved at higher resolution on regular grids. The issue is especially painful for vector-borne diseases, e.g. Lyme Disease, where infection risk is closely related to vector species and their ecological niche. MethodsThe paper presents the method of obtaining high-resolution risk maps using a pipeline with two components: (1) spatial disaggregation component, which transforms incidence rate aggregates into the point-support model using Area-to-Point Poisson Kriging, and (2) species distribution modeling component, which detects areas where ticks bite is more likely using MaxEnt model. The first component disaggregates Lyme Disease incidence rates summed over counties in Poland, Central Europe, in 2015. The second component uses ticks occurrence maps, Leaf Area Index, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Land Surface Temperature derived from Earth Observation satellites, and Digital Elevation Model. The final weighted population-at-risk map is a product of both components outputs. The pipeline is built upon open source and open science projects, and it is reusable. ResultsThe presented pipeline creates high-resolution risk maps: vector occurrence probability map, population-at-risk map, and weighted population-at-risk map which includes information about local infections and about vector species. The final maps have much better resolution than aggregated incidence rates. Visual bias for population-at-risk maps is removed, and unpopulated areas are not presented on the map. ConclusionsThe pipeline might be used for other vector-borne diseases. The final weighted population-at-risk map might be used as an input for another analytical model requiring high-resolution data placed over a regular grid. The pipeline removes visual bias and transforms aggregated data into a high-resolution point-support layer.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 36%
13.5%
2
Scientific Data
based on 30 papers
Top 0.1%
7.7%
3
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
4
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
based on 166 papers
Top 4%
4.8%
5
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 0.7%
4.6%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 3%
4.6%
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 42%
4.6%
8
Infectious Disease Modelling
based on 50 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
9
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
11
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 11%
2.4%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
13
One Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
16
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
18
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 37%
1.2%
20
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 6%
1.2%
21
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 27%
0.8%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 15%
0.7%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 22%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 28%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 10%
0.7%
28
Environmental Research
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Malaria Journal
based on 23 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
30
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 25%
0.7%