High-resolution vector-borne disease infection risk mapping with Area-to-Point Poisson Kriging and Species Distribution Modeling
Molinski, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundDisease infection data is usually aggregated and shared as a sum of infections in a given area over time. This data is presented as choropleth maps. The aggregation process protects privacy and simplifies decision-making but introduces visual bias for large areas and sparsely populated places. Moreover, aggregated areas of varying sizes cannot be simply used as the input for complex ecological models, which are based on data retrieved at higher resolution on regular grids. The issue is especially painful for vector-borne diseases, e.g. Lyme Disease, where infection risk is closely related to vector species and their ecological niche. MethodsThe paper presents the method of obtaining high-resolution risk maps using a pipeline with two components: (1) spatial disaggregation component, which transforms incidence rate aggregates into the point-support model using Area-to-Point Poisson Kriging, and (2) species distribution modeling component, which detects areas where ticks bite is more likely using MaxEnt model. The first component disaggregates Lyme Disease incidence rates summed over counties in Poland, Central Europe, in 2015. The second component uses ticks occurrence maps, Leaf Area Index, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Land Surface Temperature derived from Earth Observation satellites, and Digital Elevation Model. The final weighted population-at-risk map is a product of both components outputs. The pipeline is built upon open source and open science projects, and it is reusable. ResultsThe presented pipeline creates high-resolution risk maps: vector occurrence probability map, population-at-risk map, and weighted population-at-risk map which includes information about local infections and about vector species. The final maps have much better resolution than aggregated incidence rates. Visual bias for population-at-risk maps is removed, and unpopulated areas are not presented on the map. ConclusionsThe pipeline might be used for other vector-borne diseases. The final weighted population-at-risk map might be used as an input for another analytical model requiring high-resolution data placed over a regular grid. The pipeline removes visual bias and transforms aggregated data into a high-resolution point-support layer.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Suitability of anthrax ( Bacillus anthracis ) in the Black Sea basin through the scope of distribution modelling 94%
- Assessing mosquito dynamics and dengue transmission in Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil through an enhanced temperature-dependent mathematical model 94%
- Identifying Priority Landscapes for Conservation of Snow Leopards in Pakistan 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR or rapid antigen test result and the subsequent risk of being infectious: a mathematical simulation study 92%
- Data-Driven Prediction of COVID-19 Cases in Germany for Decision Making 92%
- A Flexible Framework for Local-Level Estimation of the Effective Reproductive Number in Geographic Regions with Sparse Data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A new, simple method of describing COVID-19 trajectory and dynamics in any country based on Johnson Cumulative Distribution Function fitting 93%
- Developing snakebite risk model using venomous snake habitat suitability as an indicating factor: An application of species distribution models in public health research 93%
- Model Based Estimation of the SARS-CoV-2 Immunization Level in Austria and Consequences for Herd Immunity Effects 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Forecasting invasive mosquito abundance in the Basque Country, Spain using machine learning techniques 96%
- Modelling the impact of climate change on the distribution and abundance of tsetse in Northern Zimbabwe 93%
- Trends in mosquito species distribution modeling: insights for vector surveillance and disease control 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.