Back

Genetic modification of the shikimate pathway to reduce lignin content in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) significantly impacts plant microbiomes

Liu, S.; Chou, M.-Y.; Benucci, G. M. N.; Eudes, A.; Bonito, G.

2024-05-03 microbiology
10.1101/2024.05.02.592240 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is considered a sustainable biofuel feedstock, given its fast-growth, low input requirements, and high biomass yields. Improvements in bioenergy conversion efficiency of switchgrass could be made by reducing its lignin content. Engineered switchgrass that expresses a bacterial 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase (QsuB) has reduced lignin content and improved biomass saccharification due to the rerouting of the shikimate pathway towards the simple aromatic protocatechuate at the expense of lignin biosynthesis. However, the impacts of this QsuB trait on switchgrass microbiome structure and function remains unclear. To address this, wildtype and QsuB engineered switchgrass were grown in switchgrass field soils and samples were collected from inflorescences, leaves, roots, rhizospheres, and bulk soils for microbiome analysis. We investigated how QsuB expression influenced switchgrass-associated fungal and bacterial communities using high-throughput Illumina MiSeq amplicon sequencing of ITS and 16S rDNA. Compared to wildtype, QsuB engineered switchgrass hosted different microbial communities in roots, rhizosphere, and leaves. Specifically, QsuB engineered plants had a lower abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Additionally, QsuB engineered plants had fewer Actinobacteriota in root and rhizosphere samples. These findings may indicate that changes in the plant metabolism impact both organismal groups similarly, or potential interactions between AMF and the bacterial community. This study enhances understanding of plant-microbiome interactions by providing baseline microbial data for developing beneficial bioengineering strategies and by assessing non-target impacts of engineered plant traits on the plant microbiome.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Phytobiomes Journal
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
4
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
5
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
7
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
8
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
9
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Microbial Biotechnology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Microbiological Research
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
19
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
20
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Applied Soil Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
25
Microbial Ecology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%