Prediction of antidepressant side effects in the Genetic Link to Anxiety and Depression Study
Li, D.; Lin, Y.; Davies, H. L.; Zvrskovec, J. K.; Wang, R.; Armour, C.; Jones, I. R.; McIntosh, A. M.; Kingston, N.; Bradley, J. R.; Hübel, C.; Kalsi, G.; Coleman, J. R. I.; the NIHR BioResource consortium, ; Hotopf, M.; Eley, T. C.; Vassos, E.; Iniesta, R.; Breen, G.; Breen, G.
Show abstract
Antidepressants are the most common treatment for moderate or severe depression. Side effects are crucial indicators for antidepressants, but their occurrence varies widely among individuals. In this study, we leveraged genetic and medical data from self-reported questionnaires in the Genetic Links to Anxiety and Depression (GLAD) study to build prediction models of side effects and subsequent discontinuation across three antidepressant classes (SSRI, SNRI, tricyclic antidepressant (TCA)) at the first and the last (most recent) year of prescription. We included 259 predictors spanning genetic, clinical, illness, demographic, and antidepressant information. Six prediction models were trained, and their performance was compared. The final dataset comprised 4,354 individuals taking SSRI in the first prescription and 3,414 taking SSRI, SNRI or TCA in the last year of prescription. In the first year, the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for predicting SSRI discontinuation and side effects were 0.65 and 0.60. In the last year of SSRI prescription, the highest AUROC reached 0.73 for discontinuation and 0.87 for side effects. Models for predicting discontinuation and side effects of SNRI and TCA showed comparable performance. The history of side effects and discontinuation of antidepressant use were the most influential predictors of the outcomes in the last year of prescription. When examining 30 common antidepressant side effect symptoms, most of them were differentially prevalent between antidepressant classes. Our findings suggested the feasibility of predicting antidepressant side effects using a self-reported questionnaire, particularly for the last prescription. These results could contribute valuable insights for the development of clinical decisions aimed at optimising treatment selection with enhanced tolerability but require replication in medical record linkage or prospective data.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A brain-enriched circRNA blood biomarker can predict response to SSRI antidepressants 94%
- Effects of SSRIs on the spatial transcriptome of dorsal raphe serotonin neurons 92%
- Epigenome-wide association study of self-reported antidepressant use in Generation Scotland implicates the innate immune system 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for a serotonergic subtype of major depressive disorder: A NeuroPharm-1 study. 94%
- Decoding Treatment Choice: Genetic and Phenotypic Analyses of Long-term Antidepressant Acceptability 94%
- Longitudinal Changes in Functional Connectivity in Antipsychotic-treated and Antipsychotic-naive Patients with First Episode Psychosis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sociodemographic, clinical, and genetic factors associated with self-reported antidepressant response outcomes in the UK Biobank 97%
- Longitudinal impact of different treatment sequences of second-generation antipsychotics on metabolic outcomes: a study using targeted maximum likelihood estimation 94%
- A common symptom geometry of mood improvement under sertraline and placebo associated with distinct neural patterns 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel preclinical secondary pharmacology resource illuminates target-adverse drug reaction associations of marketed drugs 94%
- Clinical Impact of Pharmacogenetic Risk Variants in a Large Chinese Cohort 93%
- Direct serotonin release in humans shapes decision computations within aversive environments 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.