Back

Distress and factors for maintaining good mental health among general practitioners during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Results from the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study in Austria.

Hoffmann, K.; Stummer, F. O.; Van Poel, E.; Willems, S.; Wojczewski, S.

2024-05-01 primary care research
10.1101/2024.04.30.24306629
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant negative impact on the physical and mental health of healthcare workers worldwide. The aim of the paper is to measure the frequency of distress and wellbeing among general practitioners (GPs) in Austria during the pandemic and to identify key levers that could mitigate the risks of distress. MethodsData were collected as part of the international PRICOV-19 study. In Austria, 500 GPs were randomly selected for participation in a survey between December 2020 and July 2021. For analysis, all dependent and independent variables were described using descriptive statistical methods. Subgroup analyses were conducted using cross-tables and Fishers exact tests. A binary logistic regression model was also applied. Open text question was analysed via content analysis. ResultsIn total, 130 GPs completed the relevant questions for this analysis of the online survey. More than 40% of GPs felt burned out or stated that their work schedules did not leave enough time for personal/family life. Half of the GPs were found to be in distress, with 14.3% in (very) strong distress. More than 40% of the respondents thought that government support was insufficient for the proper functioning of their practice. Working in rural areas was a protective factor against distress, as were sport and exercise, particularly outdoor activity. Connecting with family and friends and adjustments to the work environment to reduce workload were shown to be important. DiscussionOur results show that GPs in Austria suffered from distress during the first two years of the pandemic. To protect GPs as our first-line healthcare workers in pandemic or high-stress situations, several factors are required for a functioning healthcare system: support of GPs regarding work-life balance, support in terms of collaboration between colleagues and the team and easy access to green outdoor spaces for sports and exercise. By identifying key factors that promote good mental health among GPs, healthcare organizations and policymakers can take targeted action to alleviate the negative impact of stress and burnout on this critical sector of the healthcare workforce.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 13%
1.8× avg
2
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 6%
3.8× avg
3
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.2%
112× avg
4
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Elsevier BV · based on 10 published papers
#1
113× avg
5
British Journal of General Practice
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 22 published papers
Top 0.4%
52× avg
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 4%
6.1× avg
7
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 7%
3.4× avg
8
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.6%
21× avg
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 6%
4.0× avg
10
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.6%
33× avg
11
ERJ Open Research
European Respiratory Society (ERS) · based on 36 published papers
Top 1%
14× avg
12
BMC Health Services Research
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 43 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
13
Journal of Sleep Research
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.8%
20× avg
14
JMIRx Med
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 29 published papers
Top 3%
7.2× avg
15
Health Expectations
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.8%
20× avg
16
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 20%
0.9%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 287 published papers
Top 19%
0.9%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 14%
1.5× avg
19
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 19%
0.9%
20
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
21
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 5%
4.1× avg
22
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Elsevier BV · based on 35 published papers
Top 4%
4.8× avg