Distress and factors for maintaining good mental health among general practitioners during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Results from the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study in Austria.
Hoffmann, K.; Stummer, F. O.; Van Poel, E.; Willems, S.; Wojczewski, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant negative impact on the physical and mental health of healthcare workers worldwide. The aim of the paper is to measure the frequency of distress and wellbeing among general practitioners (GPs) in Austria during the pandemic and to identify key levers that could mitigate the risks of distress. MethodsData were collected as part of the international PRICOV-19 study. In Austria, 500 GPs were randomly selected for participation in a survey between December 2020 and July 2021. For analysis, all dependent and independent variables were described using descriptive statistical methods. Subgroup analyses were conducted using cross-tables and Fishers exact tests. A binary logistic regression model was also applied. Open text question was analysed via content analysis. ResultsIn total, 130 GPs completed the relevant questions for this analysis of the online survey. More than 40% of GPs felt burned out or stated that their work schedules did not leave enough time for personal/family life. Half of the GPs were found to be in distress, with 14.3% in (very) strong distress. More than 40% of the respondents thought that government support was insufficient for the proper functioning of their practice. Working in rural areas was a protective factor against distress, as were sport and exercise, particularly outdoor activity. Connecting with family and friends and adjustments to the work environment to reduce workload were shown to be important. DiscussionOur results show that GPs in Austria suffered from distress during the first two years of the pandemic. To protect GPs as our first-line healthcare workers in pandemic or high-stress situations, several factors are required for a functioning healthcare system: support of GPs regarding work-life balance, support in terms of collaboration between colleagues and the team and easy access to green outdoor spaces for sports and exercise. By identifying key factors that promote good mental health among GPs, healthcare organizations and policymakers can take targeted action to alleviate the negative impact of stress and burnout on this critical sector of the healthcare workforce.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVI-Prim survey: Challenges for Austrian and German general practitioners during initial phase of COVID-19 98%
- Attributing non-specific symptoms to cancer in general practice: a scoping review 95%
- The experience of European hospital-based health care workers on following infection prevention and control procedures for COVID-19 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre-Post Analysis of the Impact of British Columbia Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Clinics on Patient Health and Care Experience 95%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 95%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 95%
- Are Dutch General Practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?: a mixed-methods study 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of residency training in family medicine on hospital admissions due to Ambulatory-care Sensitive Conditions in Rio de Janeiro 94%
- Task shifting healthcare services in the post-COVID world: A scoping review 93%
- Determinants of practice location choices among physicians and medical students in Mali: insights into addressing medical deserts through evidence-based strategies 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.