Back

A Continuous Attractor Model with Realistic Neural and Synaptic Properties Quantitatively Reproduces Grid Cell Physiology

Sutton, N.; Gutierrez-Guzmen, B.; Dannenberg, H.; Ascoli, G. A.

2024-05-01 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.04.29.591748 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Computational simulations with data-driven physiological detail can foster a deeper understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in cognition. Here, we utilize the wealth of cellular properties from Hippocampome.org to study neural mechanisms of spatial coding with a spiking continuous attractor network model of medial entorhinal cortex circuit activity. The primary goal was to investigate if adding such realistic constraints could produce firing patterns similar to those measured in real neurons. Biological characteristics included in the work are excitability, connectivity, and synaptic signaling of neuron types defined primarily by their axonal and dendritic morphologies. We investigate the spiking dynamics in specific neuron types and the synaptic activities between groups of neurons. Modeling the rodent hippocampal formation keeps the simulations to a computationally reasonable scale while also anchoring the parameters and results to experimental measurements. Our model generates grid cell activity that well matches the spacing, size, and firing rates of grid fields recorded in live behaving animals from both published datasets and new experiments performed for this study. Our simulations also recreate different scales of those properties, e.g., small and large, as found along the dorsoventral axis of the medial entorhinal cortex. Computational exploration of neuronal and synaptic model parameters reveals that a broad range of neural properties produce grid fields in the simulation. These results demonstrate that the continuous attractor network model of grid cells is compatible with a spiking neural network implementation sourcing data-driven biophysical and anatomical parameters from Hippocampome.org. The software is released as open source to enable broad community reuse and encourage novel applications.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.8%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.8%
5
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.2%
6
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
9
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
11
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
13
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
16
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
20
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
22
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
25
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%